Skip to content

Conversation

@18202781743
Copy link
Contributor

Changed the shared library version dependency from major.minor
to major.minor.patch format in the Debian packaging rules. The
dh_makeshlibs command now includes the patch version component in the
version specification for libdtk6core library dependencies.

This update ensures that the package correctly specifies the minimum
required version including patch level, which provides more precise
dependency resolution and prevents potential compatibility issues when
only patch versions differ between library installations.

Influence:

  1. Verify package builds successfully with the new version specification
  2. Test package installation and dependency resolution
  3. Check that the correct library version requirements are enforced
  4. Validate package upgrades with different patch versions
  5. Test compatibility with existing library installations

fix: 更新共享库版本依赖

在 Debian 打包规则中将共享库版本依赖从主版本.次版本格式更改为主版本.次版
本.修订版本格式。dh_makeshlibs 命令现在在 libdtk6core 库依赖的版本规范中
包含修订版本组件。

此更新确保包正确指定包含修订版本的最低要求版本,提供更精确的依赖解析,并
在库安装之间仅修订版本不同时防止潜在的兼容性问题。

Influence:

  1. 验证包是否使用新的版本规范成功构建
  2. 测试包安装和依赖解析
  3. 检查是否正确强制执行库版本要求
  4. 验证不同修订版本的包升级
  5. 测试与现有库安装的兼容性

Changed the shared library version dependency from major.minor
to major.minor.patch format in the Debian packaging rules. The
dh_makeshlibs command now includes the patch version component in the
version specification for libdtk6core library dependencies.

This update ensures that the package correctly specifies the minimum
required version including patch level, which provides more precise
dependency resolution and prevents potential compatibility issues when
only patch versions differ between library installations.

Influence:
1. Verify package builds successfully with the new version specification
2. Test package installation and dependency resolution
3. Check that the correct library version requirements are enforced
4. Validate package upgrades with different patch versions
5. Test compatibility with existing library installations

fix: 更新共享库版本依赖

在 Debian 打包规则中将共享库版本依赖从主版本.次版本格式更改为主版本.次版
本.修订版本格式。dh_makeshlibs 命令现在在 libdtk6core 库依赖的版本规范中
包含修订版本组件。

此更新确保包正确指定包含修订版本的最低要求版本,提供更精确的依赖解析,并
在库安装之间仅修订版本不同时防止潜在的兼容性问题。

Influence:
1. 验证包是否使用新的版本规范成功构建
2. 测试包安装和依赖解析
3. 检查是否正确强制执行库版本要求
4. 验证不同修订版本的包升级
5. 测试与现有库安装的兼容性
@18202781743 18202781743 requested review from BLumia and mhduiy October 30, 2025 12:22
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

  • 检测到debian目录文件有变更: debian/rules

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

我来帮你审查这个git diff。这是一个针对debian/rules文件的修改,主要涉及版本依赖的变更。

代码审查分析:

  1. 语法逻辑:
  • 修改的语法是正确的,使用了标准的shell命令和dh_makeshlibs参数格式
  • 修改前后都保持了正确的引号配对和命令结构
  1. 代码质量:
  • 修改增加了版本号的精度,从只取主版本号和次版本号(x.y)改为包含修订版本号(x.y.z)
  • 这个改动使依赖关系更加精确,有助于避免版本兼容性问题
  1. 代码性能:
  • shell命令的性能影响微乎其微,因为cut命令处理的是简短的版本号字符串
  • 没有引入额外的性能开销
  1. 代码安全:
  • 修改没有引入新的安全风险
  • 版本依赖的精确化反而可能提高安全性,确保使用的是经过测试的特定版本

改进建议:

  1. 考虑添加错误处理:
+dh_makeshlibs -V "libdtk6core (>= $(shell echo $(VERSION) | cut -d '.' -f 1,2,3 || echo "0.0.0"))"

这样可以防止在VERSION变量未定义或格式不正确时出现错误。

  1. 考虑使用更健壮的版本解析方法:
+dh_makeshlibs -V "libdtk6core (>= $(shell dpkg-parsechangelog | awk '/^Version:/ {print $$2}' | cut -d '.' -f 1,2,3))"

这样可以直接从changelog获取版本号,更加可靠。

  1. 建议添加注释说明:
# 确保依赖包含完整的版本号(x.y.z)以避免兼容性问题
override_dh_makeshlibs:
    dh_makeshlibs -V "libdtk6core (>= $(shell echo $(VERSION) | cut -d '.' -f 1,2,3))"

总的来说,这个修改是一个积极的改进,提高了版本依赖的精确性。建议在实施时考虑添加错误处理和注释说明,以提高代码的健壮性和可维护性。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, BLumia, mhduiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit f83de4b into linuxdeepin:master Oct 30, 2025
10 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants