Skip to content

Conversation

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@deepin-ci-robot deepin-ci-robot commented Feb 27, 2025

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#467

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Improve the performance of ArrowListView by using itemAtIndex instead of accessing the model directly.

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#467
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @deepin-ci-robot - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • The removal of refreshContentItemWidth in Menu.qml seems like a significant change; can you confirm it's no longer needed?
  • In ArrowListView.qml, consider adding a check to ensure itemsView.itemAtIndex(i) returns a valid item before accessing its implicitWidth.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit a72b2bb into master Feb 27, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@18202781743 18202781743 deleted the sync-pr-467-nosync branch February 27, 2025 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants