Skip to content

Conversation

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@deepin-ci-robot deepin-ci-robot commented Mar 24, 2025

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#477

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Improves the filtering logic in SortFilterModel to correctly manage visible and invisible items.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request implements filtering logic in SortFilterModel.qml to dynamically manage the visibility of items based on the filterAcceptsItem function. It introduces separate arrays for visible and invisible items, adding and removing items from the 'visible' group as needed, and ensures that the visibleIndex is updated correctly.

Sequence diagram for filtering items in SortFilterModel

sequenceDiagram
    participant SFM as SortFilterModel
    participant Items as DelegateModel items

    SFM->>SFM: update()
    loop for each item in items
        SFM->>SFM: filterAcceptsItem(item.model)
        alt item is visible
            SFM->>Items: addGroups(item, 1, "visible")
            SFM->>SFM: visibleItems.move(item.visibleIndex, i, 1)
        else item is not visible
            SFM->>Items: removeGroups(item, 1, "visible")
        end
    end
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Implemented filtering logic to manage visible items based on a filter function.
  • Added logic to filter items based on the filterAcceptsItem function.
  • Introduced separate arrays for visible and invisible items.
  • Added logic to remove items from the 'visible' group if they no longer satisfy the filter condition.
  • Added logic to add items to the 'visible' group if they satisfy the filter condition.
  • Ensured that the visibleIndex is updated correctly after filtering.
qt6/src/qml/SortFilterModel.qml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @deepin-ci-robot - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider extracting the filtering logic into a separate function for better readability.
  • It might be more efficient to use items.move with a larger count if multiple consecutive items need to be moved.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#477
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

关键摘要:

  • update函数中,i变量在循环外被重新声明,可能导致作用域问题。
  • unVisible数组在update函数中被声明,但在函数外部没有使用,可能是不必要的。
  • items.removeGroupsitems.addGroups方法的使用可能需要确认是否正确处理了所有可能的边界情况,例如当items为空时。

是否建议立即修改:

@mhduiy mhduiy merged commit 6b0235b into master Mar 25, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@mhduiy mhduiy deleted the sync-pr-477-nosync branch March 25, 2025 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants