Skip to content

Conversation

@18202781743
Copy link
Contributor

@18202781743 18202781743 commented Jan 9, 2025

Add padding for item_checked.

pms: BUG-297075

@18202781743 18202781743 requested a review from mhduiy January 9, 2025 09:01
deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#451
Add padding for item_checked.

pms: BUG-297075
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

deepin pr auto review

根据提供的代码差异信息,我们可以看到两个文件 item_checked.dciitem_unchecked.dci 的二进制内容发生了变化。由于这些文件是二进制文件,通常用于存储图标或图像数据,因此无法直接进行语法和逻辑审查。不过,我们可以从文件名和文件类型推测一些可能的改进点:

  1. 文件命名

    • 文件名 item_checked.dciitem_unchecked.dci 表明这些文件可能用于表示某种状态(已选中或未选中)。文件名清晰明了,符合命名规范。
  2. 文件类型

    • .dci 文件扩展名可能表示某种特定的图标格式或数据格式。如果这些文件是图标文件,建议检查是否有必要更新文件格式,以确保兼容性和性能。
  3. 文件内容

    • 由于文件是二进制文件,无法直接检查文件内容。如果这些文件是图标文件,建议检查图标的质量,确保它们在不同分辨率和设备上都能正确显示。
  4. 版本控制

    • 如果这些文件是图标文件,建议在提交前进行版本控制,确保图标文件的更新不会影响其他依赖这些图标的应用程序。
  5. 性能优化

    • 如果这些图标文件较大,建议检查是否有压缩或优化图标文件的方法,以减少加载时间和资源消耗。
  6. 安全性

    • 二进制文件本身不太可能存在安全漏洞,但建议确保图标文件来源可靠,避免引入恶意代码。

总结来说,由于这些文件是二进制文件,无法直接进行语法和逻辑审查。不过,可以关注文件命名、文件类型、文件内容、版本控制、性能优化和安全性等方面,确保图标文件的质量和一致性。

deepin-ci-robot added a commit to linuxdeepin/dtk6declarative that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkdeclarative#451
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 18202781743, mhduiy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@18202781743 18202781743 changed the title master fix: item_checked icon was clipped Jan 9, 2025
@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit f8b4b74 into linuxdeepin:master Jan 9, 2025
18 of 21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants