feat: generate_script_content update

[jkbmrz]

Purpose

Platform differentiation in the generate_script_content function is not necessary anymore because we can now utilize ImageManipConfigV2 both for RVC2 and RVC4.

Specification

• update generate_script_content function:
  • remove platform differentiation during cfg_content creation,
  • add resize_mode setting;
• update associated unittests in the unittests/test_nodes/test_host_nodes/test_detection_config_generator.py na rename it to test_generate_script_content.py

Dependencies & Potential Impact

Removing the platform parameter from the generate_script_content function will cause some disturbances. Thankfully, none of the examples in depthai-experiments imports this function (but they rather use custom implementations).

Deployment Plan

None

Testing & Validation

Running the updated human-pose experiment (HERE) on RVC2.

[kkeroo]

LGTM.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 53.99%. Comparing base (1094227) to head (0695f81).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...hai_nodes/node/utils/detection_config_generator.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #206       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   31.84%   53.99%   +22.14%     
===========================================
  Files          53       85       +32     
  Lines        3074     5078     +2004     
===========================================
+ Hits          979     2742     +1763     
- Misses       2095     2336      +241     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jkbmrz]

The test_detection_config_generator.py is named a bit awkwardly. Could we rename it to test_generate_script_content.py? This seems more clear and also follows the naming convention we use elsewhere (test_<class/function_name>)

[kkeroo]

Agree.

[klemen1999]

LGTM