Skip to content

Add support for offline/local first applications #10545

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 48 commits into
base: next
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

djhi
Copy link
Collaborator

@djhi djhi commented Feb 24, 2025

Problem

React-admin currently don't handle well the loss of network connectivity: in any demo, if you go to a list page, then simulate being offline using the devtool and try to go to the second page of the same list, it will still display the first page data while the pagination will indeed indicate you are on page 2.

We handled it a bit better by at least showing users a notification when they try to load new data while offline but we can do better and allow for resumable mutations.

Solution

  • Needs Add support for mutationMode in useCreate #10530
  • Make sure the ListContext include the isPaused and isPlaceholderData props from react-query and update components/hooks accordingly
  • Show the empty component when those two props are true (ideally we should have a dedicated component for that or handle the case in the default empty but this is achievable in userland)
  • Add a mutationKey to all mutations so that we can provide default functions for them at the queryClient level (required by react-query: https://tanstack.com/query/latest/docs/framework/react/guides/mutations#persisting-offline-mutations)
  • Make the simple example work offline (no pwa yet though)
  • Add an offline prop to reference fields components
  • Add an offline prop to list components
  • Add an offline prop to show and edit views
  • Add an offline prop to reference inputs components
  • Change the notification message for pending mutations while offline
  • Update documentation

Screenshots

Edit view
image

Show view
image

DataTable (same for all list child components
image

How To Test

  • Open the simple example
  • Use the browser devtool to go offline
  • Click the posts create button and fill it
  • Go back to the posts list after and notice the new item is there
  • Open the devtool and note there is no create call to the dataProvider
  • Use the browser devtool to go online
  • Open the devtool and note there is a create call to the dataProvider

Then:

  • Follow the same steps but select the optimistic option in the form toolbar first.
  • Follow the same steps but click the undoable option in the form toolbar first.
  • Follow the same steps but edit a record instead of creating it.
  • Follow the same steps for both edit and create but enter f00bar as the post title to trigger an error once the network is online.

In stories for list components, reference components and detail views, simply switch to offline and hit the storybook refresh button

Additional Checks

  • The PR targets master for a bugfix, or next for a feature
  • The PR includes unit tests (if not possible, describe why)
  • The PR includes one or several stories (if not possible, describe why)
  • The documentation is up to date

Also, please make sure to read the contributing guidelines.

EditPostPage.setInputValue(
'input',
'title',
'Lorem Ipsum again{enter}'
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because react-query now persist queries and mutations for offline mode, the previous test now leaks into the second (e.g. this post has its title changed to Lorem Ipsum). I tried to configure testIsolation in Cypress but our version is probably too old

@djhi djhi added RFR Ready For Review and removed WIP Work In Progress labels Apr 30, 2025
@djhi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

djhi commented Apr 30, 2025

I can't see a way to test this except e2e. Not sure if we can simulate network loss with cypress though

@slax57
Copy link
Contributor

slax57 commented Apr 30, 2025

@djhi since the simple demo has the react-query DevTools enabled, you can use them to simulate network loss I believe (clicking on the 'Wifi' icon does the job). A bit ugly but it should work!

Copy link
Contributor

@erwanMarmelab erwanMarmelab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Praise: very understandable doc !!

@fzaninotto
Copy link
Member

The 'how to test' instructions must be updated, as the tester must select the optimistic mutation mode before submitting the form.

@fzaninotto
Copy link
Member

When doing an optimistic offline mutation, the loader in the app bar keeps spinning forever even tough the optimistic update is already applied. Is it a good UI? Instead, I think we should have a way to mention the pending updates, e.g. using a badge on the loader icon.

Copy link
Member

@fzaninotto fzaninotto left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We're getting closer!

</AppBar>
);
const MyAppBar = () => {
const isOnline = useIsOnline();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd name the hook useIsOffline instead, since you only ever check that it's false.

)
```
{% endraw %}

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You're missing a sentence to explain that the setup is done here - the rest is only for developers with custom methods.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added

@@ -95,6 +117,10 @@ const Root = styled('div', {
[`& .${EditClasses.noActions}`]: {
marginTop: '1em',
},
[`& .${EditClasses.offline}`]: {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code smell: The Offline component should work as is, without CSS customization.

Comment on lines -125 to +142
<div>
<Stack direction="row" alignItems="center" gap={1}>
<ErrorIcon role="presentation" color="error" fontSize="small" />
<span style={visuallyHidden}>
{typeof error === 'string' ? error : error?.message}
</span>
</div>
<Typography
component="span"
variant="body2"
sx={{ color: 'error.main' }}
>
<Translate i18nKey="ra.notification.http_error">
Server communication error
</Translate>
</Typography>
</Stack>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You've changed the content and design here. Can you elaborate on why you did that?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@djhi djhi May 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We only had an icon for error before with no message for users not using assistive tools. We discussed this together

}

if (
!record ||
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is already in the previous condition

{...rest}
offline={
offline ?? (
<Labeled {...rest}>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It feels weird to repeat rest several times, plus some aren't compatible with Labeled. I wouldn't apply them here, and pass the source and label props explicitly instead.

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ export * from './ListGuesser';
export * from './ListNoResults';
export * from './ListToolbar';
export * from './ListView';
export * from '../Offline';
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

reexported from the wrong directory (the .. is weird here)

Co-authored-by: Francois Zaninotto <[email protected]>
@djhi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

djhi commented Jun 6, 2025

When doing an optimistic offline mutation, the loader in the app bar keeps spinning forever even tough the optimistic update is already applied. Is it a good UI? Instead, I think we should have a way to mention the pending updates, e.g. using a badge on the loader icon.

The loading indicator now has a badge when users are offline and there are pending mutations. This badge also has a tooltip that explains it.

Copy link
Contributor

@slax57 slax57 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only reviewed the docs and the simple demo so far...


queryClient.setMutationDefaults('banUser', {
mutationFn: async (userId) => {
return dataProviderFn.banUser(userId);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return dataProviderFn.banUser(userId);
return dataProvider.banUser(userId);

Comment on lines +15 to +18
"@tanstack/query-sync-storage-persister": "5.47.0",
"@tanstack/react-query": "^5.21.7",
"@tanstack/react-query-devtools": "^5.21.7",
"@tanstack/react-query-persist-client": "5.47.0",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
"@tanstack/query-sync-storage-persister": "5.47.0",
"@tanstack/react-query": "^5.21.7",
"@tanstack/react-query-devtools": "^5.21.7",
"@tanstack/react-query-persist-client": "5.47.0",
"@tanstack/query-sync-storage-persister": "^5.47.0",
"@tanstack/react-query": "^5.21.7",
"@tanstack/react-query-devtools": "^5.21.7",
"@tanstack/react-query-persist-client": "^5.47.0",

Comment on lines +64 to +69
/**
* When react-query resumes persisted mutations through their default functions (provided in the getOfflineFirstQueryClient file) after the browser tab
* has been closed, it cannot handle their side effects unless we set up some defaults. In order to leverage the react-admin notification system
* we add a default onSettled function to the mutation defaults here.
*/
const NotificationsFromQueryClient = () => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bump


export const queryClient = new QueryClient();

const queryClientWithOfflineSupport = addOfflineSupportToQueryClient({
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the point of queryClientWithOfflineSupport variable? Why is it not exported instead of queryClient? Is queryClient mutated when you use addOfflineSupportToQueryClient, so exporting it is not required? Current variable naming makes me think that queryClient doesn't have offline support.

EDIT: in following examples, it's much clearer.

Suggested change
const queryClientWithOfflineSupport = addOfflineSupportToQueryClient({
const baseQueryClient = new QueryClient();
export const queryClient = addOfflineSupportToQueryClient({
queryClient,
dataProvider,
resources: ['posts', 'comments'],
});

const translate = useTranslate();

if (isPaused && (data == null || isPlaceholderData)) return <Offline />;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add a quick example about this in docs? At least something mentioning that you can use isPaused and isPlaceholderData to detect that you're in offline mode.

// be possible if the app was also a PWA.
// We only do that for optimistic and undoable modes in order to not break any existing tests that expect
// the id to be generated by the server (e.g. by FakeRest).
let next_id = 100;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why 100? You could technically already have another post with ID 100, isn't it?
For client-generated ids, I use negative numbers, to quickly notice that they are not real IDs, and is usually enough to ensure that they are not conflicting with persisted data.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But they are real ids. They won't be replaced on the backend. I would use uuid but that's too much changes of the current data. Besides, we actually control the simple example data and know we don't have ids greater than 100. I believe this is enough to showcase and test the feature

@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ export const useReferenceArrayInputController = <
error: errorGetMany,
isLoading: isLoadingGetMany,
isFetching: isFetchingGetMany,
isPaused: isPausedGetMany,
isPending: isPendingGetMany,
refetch: refetchGetMany,
} = useGetManyAggregate<RecordType>(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No isPlaceholderData here? What's the difference with useReferenceArrayFieldController?

* </PersistQueryClientProvider>
* );
*
* @example <caption>Adding offline support with custom mutations</caption>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aren't these examples mixed up? The first one shows with a custom mutation and the second one without it.

}

interface ComponentsPropsList {
RaOffline: Partial<Offline>;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use [PREFIX] instead of 'RaOffline'.


interface Components {
RaOffline?: {
defaultProps?: ComponentsPropsList['RaOffline'];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use typeof PREFIX instead of 'RaOffline'.

</Edit>
);

export const Offline = ({ dataProvider = dataProviderWithAuthors }) => (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested it and the default AutocompleteInput shows "Loading..." instead of the offline component that I expected. I think you need to change useChoicesContext to propagate isPaused and isPlaceholderData to show a better message in offline mode.

title={
<Translate
i18nKey="ra.notifications.pending_operations"
options={{ smart_count: 1 }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why { smart_count: 1 }? Shouldn't it be { smart_count: pendingMutations.length }?

);

export const Offline = () => (
<Wrapper listContext={{ isPaused: true }}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This story shows nothing. Is it supposed to show the offline component?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFR Ready For Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants