Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FF135 Certificate Transparency #37812

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 27, 2025

Conversation

hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator

FF135 provides support Certificate Transparency. This adds a release note and minor updates to the CT doc.

Fixes #35570

Related docs work can be tracked in #37811

@hamishwillee hamishwillee requested review from a team as code owners January 26, 2025 23:57
@hamishwillee hamishwillee requested review from bsmth and removed request for a team January 26, 2025 23:57
@github-actions github-actions bot added Content:Security Security docs Content:Firefox Content in the Mozilla/Firefox subtree size/s [PR only] 6-50 LoC changed labels Jan 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 26, 2025

Preview URLs

External URLs (3)

URL: /en-US/docs/Mozilla/Firefox/Releases/135
Title: Firefox 135 for developers


URL: /en-US/docs/Web/Security/Certificate_Transparency
Title: Certificate Transparency

(comment last updated: 2025-01-27 00:08:18)

Comment on lines +47 to +48
Browser implementations are based on the obsoleted specification {{rfc("6962","Certificate Transparency")}} (January 2025).
The current specification is {{rfc("9162","Certificate Transparency Version 2.0")}}.
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This bit fixes #35570 by noting the spec things are implemented on and the current version.
Note, I'd do this with spec-urls metadata but they shows unknown specs for both.
I'm also in discussion with BCD team about whether the version data can go into BCD, which IMO would be better.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

whether the version data can go into BCD, which IMO would be better.

This would be great

Copy link
Member

@bsmth bsmth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Leaving a +1 and we can follow-up with spec_urls or BCD 👍🏻

Should we add a TODO in 37811 so we don't forget?

@hamishwillee hamishwillee merged commit 5b75590 into mdn:main Jan 27, 2025
8 checks passed
@hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bsmth Thanks. The TODO is effectively the BCD note in 37811 - I'm waiting on a slack response. If I don't get one then there will be no BCD and this won't change. So merging. If we do get one then I'll create a new PR with the tidy. The point you know I've given up on BCD is when I mark dev-docs-complete in the tracking issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Content:Firefox Content in the Mozilla/Firefox subtree Content:Security Security docs size/s [PR only] 6-50 LoC changed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Certificate Transparency is defined in RFC 6962, not RFC 9162
2 participants