-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.4k
chore(deps): update dependency vite to v6.1.5 [security] #6418
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
✅ Deploy Preview for mermaid-js ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
commit: |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #6418 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 3.87% 3.87%
=======================================
Files 412 412
Lines 43134 43134
Branches 664 664
=======================================
Hits 1672 1672
Misses 41462 41462
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
2728a62
to
11ee16d
Compare
f1f84cd
to
f64a019
Compare
3eff588
to
597e08e
Compare
✅ Deploy Preview for mermaid-js ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
3458716
to
1e23816
Compare
c314cc8
to
0c5e063
Compare
79ad0ec
to
df81db4
Compare
df81db4
to
7a6f137
Compare
This PR contains the following updates:
6.1.1
->6.1.5
GitHub Vulnerability Alerts
CVE-2025-30208
Summary
The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser.
Impact
Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using
--host
orserver.host
config option) are affected.Details
@fs
denies access to files outside of Vite serving allow list. Adding?raw??
or?import&raw??
to the URL bypasses this limitation and returns the file content if it exists. This bypass exists because trailing separators such as?
are removed in several places, but are not accounted for in query string regexes.PoC
CVE-2025-31125
Summary
The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser.
Impact
Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using
--host
orserver.host
config option) are affected.Details
?inline&import
(originally reported as?import&?inline=1.wasm?init
)?raw?import
/@​fs/
isn't needed to reproduce the issue for files inside the project root.PoC
Original report (check details above for simplified cases):
The ?import&?inline=1.wasm?init ending allows attackers to read arbitrary files and returns the file content if it exists. Base64 decoding needs to be performed twice
Example full URL
http://localhost:5173/@​fs/C:/windows/win.ini?import&?inline=1.wasm?init
CVE-2025-31486
Summary
The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser.
Impact
Only apps explicitly exposing the Vite dev server to the network (using --host or server.host config option) are affected..
Details
.svg
Requests ending with
.svg
are loaded at this line.https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/037f801075ec35bb6e52145d659f71a23813c48f/packages/vite/src/node/plugins/asset.ts#L285-L290
By adding
?.svg
with?.wasm?init
or withsec-fetch-dest: script
header, the restriction was able to bypass.This bypass is only possible if the file is smaller than
build.assetsInlineLimit
(default: 4kB) and when using Vite 6.0+.relative paths
The check was applied before the id normalization. This allowed requests to bypass with relative paths (e.g.
../../
).PoC
npm create vite@latest cd vite-project/ npm install npm run dev
send request to read
etc/passwd
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:5173/etc/passwd?.svg?.wasm?init'
curl 'http://127.0.0.1:5173/@​fs/x/x/x/vite-project/?/../../../../../etc/passwd?import&?raw'
CVE-2025-32395
Summary
The contents of arbitrary files can be returned to the browser if the dev server is running on Node or Bun.
Impact
Only apps with the following conditions are affected.
Details
HTTP 1.1 spec (RFC 9112) does not allow
#
inrequest-target
. Although an attacker can send such a request. For those requests with an invalidrequest-line
(it includesrequest-target
), the spec recommends to reject them with 400 or 301. The same can be said for HTTP 2 (ref1, ref2, ref3).On Node and Bun, those requests are not rejected internally and is passed to the user land. For those requests, the value of
http.IncomingMessage.url
contains#
. Vite assumedreq.url
won't contain#
when checkingserver.fs.deny
, allowing those kinds of requests to bypass the check.On Deno, those requests are not rejected internally and is passed to the user land as well. But for those requests, the value of
http.IncomingMessage.url
did not contain#
.PoC
send request to read
/etc/passwd
Release Notes
vitejs/vite (vite)
v6.1.5
Compare Source
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v6.1.4
Compare Source
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v6.1.3
Compare Source
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
v6.1.2
Compare Source
Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for details.
Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.