Cleanups

[muraalee]

No description provided.

[mesa-dot-dev]

Mesa Description

This pull request focuses on general code cleanup and refactoring. The changes aim to improve code quality, readability, and maintainability without adding new features or fixing specific bugs. This includes removing unused code, simplifying logic, and ensuring consistency with existing coding standards.

^{Description generated by Mesa. Update settings}

[mesa-dot-dev]

Performed full review of 4a7fd89...4123433

Analysis

1. Duplication of greeting lists across four language implementations creates maintenance issues, as each copy can drift independently over time.
2. Lack of a single source of truth for the greetings means future additions or modifications will require synchronized changes across multiple files.
3. The current approach of hard-coding greetings in each language implementation doesn't scale well as the number of supported languages or greetings increases.
4. Consider implementing a centralized definition (shared documentation or code generator) to ensure consistency across language implementations.

Tip

Help

Slash Commands:

• /review - Request a full code review
• /review latest - Review only changes since the last review
• /describe - Generate PR description. This will update the PR body or issue comment depending on your configuration
• /help - Get help with Mesa commands and configuration options

^{0 files reviewed | 1 comments | Edit Agent Settings • Read Docs}

[mesa-dot-dev]

We jump from Cursor C2 directly to Cursor C4 here. If the goal of this program is to greet every Cursor release in order (similar to how OpenCode now lists C1‒C4), should we also add a Cursor C3 line for completeness? Right now the numbering is inconsistent and could confuse anyone comparing the different client greetings.

 • 

Prompt for Agent

Task: Address review feedback left on GitHub.
Repository: mesa-dot-dev/agentblame-sandbox#11
File: java/Hello.java#L12
Action: Open this file location in your editor, inspect the highlighted code, and resolve the issue described below.

Feedback:
We jump from `Cursor C2` directly to `Cursor C4` here. If the goal of this program is to greet every Cursor release in order (similar to how OpenCode now lists C1‒C4), should we also add a `Cursor C3` line for completeness? Right now the numbering is inconsistent and could confuse anyone comparing the different client greetings.