chore(deps): bump jws from 3.2.2 to 3.2.3

[dependabot]

Bumps jws from 3.2.2 to 3.2.3.

Release notes

Sourced from jws's releases.

v3.2.3

Changed

• Fix advisory GHSA-869p-cjfg-cm3x: createSign and createVerify now require that a non empty secret is provided (via opts.secret, opts.privateKey or opts.key) when using HMAC algorithms.
• Upgrading JWA version to 1.4.2, addressing a compatibility issue for Node >= 25.

Changelog

Sourced from jws's changelog.

[3.2.3]

Changed

• Fix advisory GHSA-869p-cjfg-cm3x: createSign and createVerify now require that a non empty secret is provided (via opts.secret, opts.privateKey or opts.key) when using HMAC algorithms.
• Upgrading JWA version to 1.4.2, adressing a compatibility issue for Node >= 25.

[3.0.0]

Changed

• BREAKING: jwt.verify now requires an algorithm parameter, and jws.createVerify requires an algorithm option. The "alg" field signature headers is ignored. This mitigates a critical security flaw in the library which would allow an attacker to generate signatures with arbitrary contents that would be accepted by jwt.verify. See https://auth0.com/blog/2015/03/31/critical-vulnerabilities-in-json-web-token-libraries/ for details.

2.0.0 - 2015-01-30

Changed

• BREAKING: Default payload encoding changed from binary to utf8. utf8 is a is a more sensible default than binary because many payloads, as far as I can tell, will contain user-facing strings that could be in any language. (6b6de48)

• Code reorganization, thanks @​fearphage! (7880050)

Added

• Option in all relevant methods for encoding. For those few users that might be depending on a binary encoding of the messages, this is for them. (6b6de48)

Commits

• 4f6e73f Merge commit from fork
• bd0fea5 version 3.2.3
• 7c3b4b4 Enhance tests for HMAC streaming sign and verify
• a9b8ed9 Improve secretOrKey initialization in VerifyStream
• 6707fde Improve secret handling in SignStream
• See full diff in compare view

Maintainer changes

This version was pushed to npm by julien.wollscheid, a new releaser for jws since your current version.

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

[microsoft-github-policy-service]

Thank you for creating a Pull Request @@dependabot[bot].

This is a checklist for the PR reviewer(s) to complete before approving and merging this PR:

• I have verified a documentation PR has been linked and is approved (or not applicable)
• I have ran this PR locally and have tested the fix/feature
• I have verified that stories have been added to storybook (or not applicable)
• I have tested existing stories in storybook to verify no regression has occured
• I have tested the solution in at least two browsers (Edge + 1 non-Chromium based browser)