Fix misleading CUDA device specification by replacing 'cuda:0' with 'cuda' #2184
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This change updates the CUDA device specification from cuda:0 to cuda to prevent confusion. Specifying cuda:0 can be misleading as it utilises all available GPUs, not just GPU 0. By using CUDA, the behaviour aligns with user expectations and improves clarity in device selection.
This issue was also discussed in #2165, where it was noted that the cuda:0 label could cause misunderstanding in multi-GPU environments. This fix ensures consistency and avoids potential misinterpretation.