Skip to content

test(NODE-6775): support auto encryption in the unified test runner #4584

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 21, 2025

Conversation

baileympearson
Copy link
Contributor

@baileympearson baileympearson commented Jul 14, 2025

Description

What is changing?

This PR adds UTR support for auto encryption tests.

As a part of this work, I made the entities.ts depend on config.ts. This uncovered a circular dependency between utils and flaky.ts. This caused the dependency action to fail. I resolved the circular dependency by removing the TestBuilder and UnifiedTestBuilder from utils into a separate file. This removes any dependency on the unified test runner from the utils file.

Is there new documentation needed for these changes?

What is the motivation for this change?

Release Highlight

Fill in title or leave empty for no highlight

Double check the following

  • Ran npm run check:lint script
  • Self-review completed using the steps outlined here
  • PR title follows the correct format: type(NODE-xxxx)[!]: description
    • Example: feat(NODE-1234)!: rewriting everything in coffeescript
  • Changes are covered by tests
  • New TODOs have a related JIRA ticket

@baileympearson baileympearson marked this pull request as ready for review July 18, 2025 18:15
@baileympearson baileympearson requested a review from a team as a code owner July 18, 2025 18:15
@durran durran self-assigned this Jul 21, 2025
@durran durran added the Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes label Jul 21, 2025
@durran durran merged commit 6e240d4 into mongodb:main Jul 21, 2025
28 of 31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Primary Review In Review with primary reviewer, not yet ready for team's eyes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants