@wagnerand would you expect the (promoted|auto-approval-disabled|etc) NHR for the review to be cleared in the reviewer tools if the add-on is forwarded on to legal? (I'm assuming so, but double checking)

I spoke with Andreas and we decided:

1. The content should be disabled if legal chooses that action.
2. In the event that legal forward a job back to the AMO reviewers, we need to ensure it flags for human review so they are aware it needs to be checked.
3. If an add-on is forwarded to legal, we should clear the human review flag. However, we should add this scenario to the existing redash alerts that tell us when something gets "stuck" without action. Apparently @diox has set this up for other scenarios.

Looking at first scenario and trying Ignore/Not enough information policy won't send any email either.
I tried with https://reviewers.addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/reviewers/review-listed/635597
Cinder job would be https://stage.cinder.nonprod.webservices.mozgcp.net/job/c18e2f37-bc16-4962-a929-1c61c9632825

Looking at first scenario and trying Ignore/Not enough information policy won't send any email either. I tried with https://reviewers.addons-dev.allizom.org/en-US/reviewers/review-listed/635597 Cinder job would be https://stage.cinder.nonprod.webservices.mozgcp.net/job/c18e2f37-bc16-4962-a929-1c61c9632825

yes, there isn't any need to try to any other types of decision from cinder - they will all fail.

https://mozilla.sentry.io/issues/6147125161/?project=6224627&query=is%3Aunresolved%20issue.priority%3A%5Bhigh%2C%20medium%5D&referrer=issue-stream&statsPeriod=14d&stream_index=0 is the traceback that's occurring