Skip to content

feat: Add OrgScript Engineer agent profile#367

Open
DKFuH wants to merge 1 commit intomsitarzewski:mainfrom
DKFuH:feature/orgscript-engineer-agent
Open

feat: Add OrgScript Engineer agent profile#367
DKFuH wants to merge 1 commit intomsitarzewski:mainfrom
DKFuH:feature/orgscript-engineer-agent

Conversation

@DKFuH
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@DKFuH DKFuH commented Mar 29, 2026

What does this PR do?

Adds a new agent profile for an OrgScript Engineer. This agent is specialized in translating business processes and SOPs into machine-readable and valid scripts according to the OrgScript definition language. It understands the tooling stack (validate, format, lint) and can generate AST-based exports such as Mermaid diagrams or Markdown summaries for the OrgScript parser.

Agent Information (if adding/modifying an agent)

  • Agent Name: OrgScript Engineer
  • Category: Engineering
  • Specialty: OrgScript Syntax, Parsing, AST Validation, and Process Modeling

Checklist

  • Follows the agent template structure from CONTRIBUTING.md
  • Includes YAML frontmatter with name, description, color
  • Has concrete code/template examples (for new agents)
  • Tested in real scenarios
  • Proofread and formatted correctly

@mhc222
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mhc222 commented Mar 30, 2026

Code review

No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@msitarzewski
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Hey @DKFuH — this is a well-structured agent! All 10 required sections are present with correct emoji headers, the frontmatter is complete, and the OrgScript code examples are concrete.

We checked — OrgScript is Apache-2.0 open source, which clears the promo/paid-service concern. The concept of turning SOPs into machine-readable logic is genuinely useful.

One question: the file has a comment from a code reviewer — have those issues been addressed? If so, this is ready to merge. If you could confirm, we'll pull the trigger. Thanks!

@DKFuH
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

DKFuH commented Apr 12, 2026

Confirmed! The code reviewer's comment states "No issues found. Checked for bugs and CLAUDE.md compliance." — so everything is clear. Ready to merge whenever you are!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants