Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #410

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 13, 2025
Merged

Update README.md #410

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 13, 2025

Conversation

astrolamb
Copy link
Contributor

@astrolamb astrolamb commented Feb 4, 2025

Updated README for apple silicon installation. @AaronDJohnson can you review?

Updated README for apple silicon installation
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.55%. Comparing base (80b70cc) to head (9e049e0).
Report is 102 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #410       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   85.33%   71.55%   -13.79%     
===========================================
  Files          13       13               
  Lines        3158     3245       +87     
===========================================
- Hits         2695     2322      -373     
- Misses        463      923      +460     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 40060b1...9e049e0. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vhaasteren
Copy link
Member

Hi @astrolamb, can you merge dev or master, and push your branch?

Then, perhaps adjust the text so that it reflects the new situation about libstempo and PINT not being required? Just say that, in the case that these packages are desired on arm, we must do...

Thanks!

reflecting that libstempo is no longer a requirement
@astrolamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vhaasteren done

@vhaasteren vhaasteren merged commit 568650b into nanograv:master Mar 13, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants