Skip to content

Conversation

ibrahima
Copy link

Based on #213 and the comments on 4854553, the current README incorrectly describes an issue with the expiration setting when it is actually meant to be describing an issue with the expireat setting. This updates the documentation to correctly describe the issue.

Based on nateware#213 and the comments on nateware@4854553, the current README incorrectly describes an issue with the `expiration` setting when it is actually meant to be describing an issue with the `expireat` setting. This updates the documentation to correctly describe the issue.
@matthewhively
Copy link

The way the documentation is worded, it almost seems like it should have a "bad example" and a "good example". So the wording is warning you about something, that isn't shown... since the example is already using lambda.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants