Partitioning: Use more consistent language regarding partitions and buckets

nats-concepts/subject_mapping.md

@@ -257,15 +257,15 @@ Examples:
 
 Deterministic token partitioning allows you to use subject-based addressing to deterministically divide (partition) a flow of messages where one or more of the subject tokens is mapped into a partition key. Deterministically means, the same tokens are always mapped into the same key. The mapping will appear random and may not be `fair` for a small number of subjects.
 
-For example: new customer orders are published on `neworders.<customer id>`, you can partition those messages over 3 partition numbers (buckets), using the `partition(number of partitions, wildcard token positions...)` function which returns a partition number (between 0 and number of partitions-1) by using the following mapping `"neworders.*" : "neworders.{{wildcard(1)}}.{{partition(3,1)}}"`.
+For example: new customer orders are published on `neworders.<customer id>`, you can partition those messages over 3 partition numbers (buckets), using the `partition(number of buckets, wildcard token positions...)` function which returns a partition number (between 0 and number of partitions-1) by using the following mapping `"neworders.*" : "neworders.{{wildcard(1)}}.{{partition(3,1)}}"`.
 
 ```
 nats server mapping "neworders.*" "neworders.{{wildcard(1)}}.{{partition(3,1)}}" neworders.customerid1
 > neworders.customerid1.0
 ```
 
 {% hint style="info" %}
-Note that multiple token positions can be specified to form a kind of _composite partition key_. For example, a subject with the form `foo.*.*` can have a partition transform of `foo.{{wildcard(1)}}.{{wildcard(2)}}.{{partition(5,1,2)}}` which will result in five partitions in the form `foo.*.*.<n>`, but using the hash of the two wildcard tokens when computing the partition number.
+Note that multiple token positions can be specified to form a kind of _composite partition key_. For example, a subject with the form `foo.*.*` can have a partition transform of `foo.{{wildcard(1)}}.{{wildcard(2)}}.{{partition(5,1,2)}}` which will result in five buckets in the form `foo.*.*.<n>`, but using the hash of the two wildcard tokens when computing the partition number.
 
 ```
 nats server mapping "foo.*.*" "foo.{{wildcard(1)}}.{{wildcard(2)}}.{{partition(5,1,2)}}" foo.us.customerid 
@@ -284,9 +284,9 @@ This particular transform means that any message published on `neworders.<custom
 | neworders.customerid5 | neworders.customerid5.1 |
 | neworders.customerid6 | neworders.customerid6.0 |
 
-The transform is deterministic because (as long as the number of partitions is 3) 'customerid1' will always map to the same partition number. The mapping is hash-based, its distribution is random but tends towards 'perfectly balanced' distribution (i.e. the more keys you map the more the number of keys for each partition will tend to converge to the same number).
+The transform is deterministic because (as long as the number of buckets is 3) 'customerid1' will always map to the same partition number. The mapping is hash-based, its distribution is random but tends towards 'perfectly balanced' distribution (i.e. the more keys you map the more the number of keys for each partition will tend to converge to the same number).
 
-You can partition on more than one subject wildcard token at a time, e.g.: `{{partition(10,1,2)}}` distributes the union of token wildcards 1 and 2 over 10 partitions.
+You can partition on more than one subject wildcard token at a time, e.g.: `{{partition(10,1,2)}}` distributes the union of token wildcards 1 and 2 over 10 buckets.
 
 | Published on | Mapped to |
 | ------------ | --------- |
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ The core NATS queue-groups and JetStream durable consumer mechanisms to distribu
 
 This means that if the application requires strictly ordered message processing, you need to limit distribution of messages to 'one at a time' (per consumer/queue-group, i.e. using the 'max acks pending' setting), which in turn hurts scalability because it means no matter how many workers you have subscribed, only one is doing any processing work at a time.
 
-Being able to evenly split (i.e. partition) subjects in a deterministic manner (meaning that all the messages on a particular subject are always mapped to the same partition) allows you to distribute and scale the processing of messages in a subject stream while still maintaining strict ordering per subject. For example, inserting a partition number as a token in the message subject as part of the stream definition and then using subject filters to create a consumer per partition (or set of partitions).
+Being able to evenly split (i.e. partition) subjects in a deterministic manner (meaning that all the messages on a particular subject are always mapped to the same bucket) allows you to distribute and scale the processing of messages in a subject stream while still maintaining strict ordering per subject. For example, inserting a partition number as a token in the message subject as part of the stream definition and then using subject filters to create a consumer per bucket (or set of buckets).
 
 Another scenario for deterministic partitioning is in the extreme message publication rate scenarios where you are reaching the limits of the throughput of incoming messages into a stream capturing messages using a wildcard subject. This limit can be ultimately reached at very high message rate due to the fact that a single nats-server process is acting as the RAFT leader (coordinator) for any given stream and can therefore become a limiting factor. In that case, distributing (i.e. partitioning) that stream into a number of smaller streams (each one with its own RAFT leader and therefore all these RAFT leaders are spread over all of the JetStream-enabled nats-servers in the cluster rather than a single one) in order to scale.