chore: CI/CD #98
chore: CI/CD #98
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates unveil a sophisticated framework designed to optimize the coding environment, enhance automated testing workflows, and refine script management. Key features include structured code reviews, multi-platform testing automation, and clearer organization of command scripts. Collectively, these improvements foster superior code quality, collaboration, and user engagement throughout the project. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant GitHub Actions
participant Nix
participant Haskell Environment
User->>GitHub Actions: Push code changes
GitHub Actions->>Nix: Install dependencies
Nix->>Haskell Environment: Run build
Haskell Environment->>Nix: Return build status
GitHub Actions->>Haskell Environment: Run tests
Haskell Environment-->>GitHub Actions: Return test results
GitHub Actions-->>User: Notify test outcome
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
devenv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (5)
- .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- cli/test/Main.hs (1 hunks)
- core/test/Main.hs (1 hunks)
- devenv.nix (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (21)
cli/test/Main.hs (1)
6-6: Verify the change fromputStrLntoThe change from
putStrLntocore/test/Main.hs (1)
6-6: Verify the change fromputStrLntoThe change from
putStrLntodevenv.nix (7)
12-12: LGTM! Addition ofdoctestis beneficial.The addition of
haskellPackages.doctestis beneficial for testing Haskell code.
17-17: LGTM!run-watchcommand is well-defined.The
run-watchcommand is well-defined and retains the functionality of the previous watch script.
18-18: LGTM!run-buildcommand is well-defined.The
run-buildcommand is well-defined and streamlines the build process.
19-19: LGTM!run-updatecommand is well-defined.The
run-updatecommand is well-defined and facilitates easier management of dependencies.
20-20: LGTM!run-clicommand is well-defined.The
run-clicommand is well-defined and enhances the usability of the command-line interface.
21-24: LGTM!run-core-testscommand is well-defined.The
run-core-testscommand is well-defined and improves the testing workflow for thenhcoremodule.
25-27: LGTM!run-cli-testscommand is well-defined.The
run-cli-testscommand is well-defined and focuses on running tests for thenhclimodule..github/workflows/test.yml (5)
1-10: The workflow name and triggers are appropriate.The workflow is named "Test" and is triggered on pull requests and pushes to the main branch. This setup is suitable for a CI/CD pipeline.
11-16: The job strategy and matrix are well-defined.The job strategy uses a matrix to run tests on
ubuntu-latestandmacos-latest, ensuring cross-platform compatibility.
18-35: The environment setup steps are essential and well-structured.The steps include checking out the code, installing Nix, and setting up caching for Cabal, which are crucial for setting up the environment and optimizing build times.
38-39: Updating the Cabal Hackage list is a good practice.The step updates the Cabal Hackage list using
devenv shell run-update, ensuring that the latest package information is available.
44-51: The steps for building the project and running tests are thorough.The steps include building the project and running core and CLI tests using
devenv, ensuring that the project is built and tested thoroughly..coderabbit.yaml (7)
1-3: The language and tone instructions are appropriate.The language is set to
en-USand the tone instructions specify a respectful, but commanding tone, ensuring consistent and authoritative communication.
4-5: Enabling early access and free tier is beneficial.These settings provide access to new features and encourage user engagement.
6-28: The review settings are comprehensive and well-structured.These settings cater to different aspects of the review process, ensuring thorough and structured reviews.
29-35: The auto review settings enhance efficiency.These settings automate and streamline the review process, making it more efficient.
36-83: The tool settings ensure code quality and adherence to best practices.Enabling various linters and checkers such as ShellCheck, Ruff, MarkdownLint, and more, helps maintain code quality.
84-85: Enabling auto reply for chat is beneficial.This setting ensures timely responses and enhances user experience.
86-95: The knowledge base settings enhance collaboration and knowledge sharing.These settings provide a centralized knowledge base and integrate with popular project management tools such as Jira and Linear.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (5)
- core/core/Array.hs (11 hunks)
- core/core/Maybe.hs (3 hunks)
- core/core/Unknown.hs (1 hunks)
- core/nhcore.cabal (1 hunks)
- devenv.nix (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
devenv.nix (5)
17-17: Approved:run-watch.execcommand.The
run-watch.execcommand correctly usesghcidto runcabal replwith a provided argument. This is useful for continuous integration and development.
18-18: Approved:run-build.execcommand.The
run-build.execcommand correctly builds all components using Cabal, streamlining the build process.
19-19: Approved:run-update.execcommand.The
run-update.execcommand correctly updates the Cabal package list, simplifying dependency management.
20-20: Approved:run-cli.execcommand.The
run-cli.execcommand correctly runs thenhcliapplication with provided arguments, enhancing command-line usability.
25-27: Approved:run-cli-tests.execcommand.The
run-cli-tests.execcommand correctly runs tests for thenhclimodule.core/core/Maybe.hs (1)
2-14: Approved: Reformatting and reordering of the export list.The reformatting and reordering of the module's export list improve clarity and organization without altering functionality.
core/nhcore.cabal (1)
40-41: Dependencies added correctly.The additions of
QuickCheckandquickcheck-instancesto thebuild-dependssection are correct and will enhance the testing capabilities of the package.core/core/Array.hs (2)
2-35: Export list reformatted for clarity.The reformatting of the module's export list improves readability and maintains the module's functionality.
46-59: NewQuickCheck.Arbitraryinstance added correctly.The new instance of
QuickCheck.Arbitraryfor theArraytype is correctly implemented, allowing for property-based testing.
| run-core-tests.exec = '' | ||
| cabal repl nhcore --with-compiler=doctest && \ | ||
| cabal test nhcore | ||
| ''; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approved: run-core-tests.exec command, with a suggestion for clarity.
The run-core-tests.exec command correctly runs tests for the nhcore module, including a REPL session with doctest. However, consider separating the REPL session and the test execution for better clarity and maintainability.
- cabal repl nhcore --with-compiler=doctest && \
- cabal test nhcore
+ cabal repl nhcore --with-compiler=doctest
+ cabal test nhcoreCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| run-core-tests.exec = '' | |
| cabal repl nhcore --with-compiler=doctest && \ | |
| cabal test nhcore | |
| ''; | |
| run-core-tests.exec = '' | |
| cabal repl nhcore --with-compiler=doctest | |
| cabal test nhcore | |
| ''; |
|
|
||
| -- | Convert a value of any type to 'Unknown'. | ||
| -- | ||
| -- >>> fromValue 42 | ||
| -- Unknown (Data.Dynamic.toDyn 42) | ||
| -- | ||
| -- >>> fromValue "hello" | ||
| -- Unknown (Data.Dynamic.toDyn "hello") | ||
| fromValue :: (Typeable value) => value -> Unknown | ||
| fromValue value = |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reinstate example usage comments for fromValue.
The removal of example usage comments reduces the clarity of the documentation. Consider reinstating the examples to illustrate how to convert values to Unknown.
+-- Example usage:
+-- >>> fromValue (42 :: Int)
+-- Unknown <dynamic value>
+-- >>> fromValue "hello"
+-- Unknown <dynamic value>Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| -- | Convert a value of any type to 'Unknown'. | |
| -- | |
| -- >>> fromValue 42 | |
| -- Unknown (Data.Dynamic.toDyn 42) | |
| -- | |
| -- >>> fromValue "hello" | |
| -- Unknown (Data.Dynamic.toDyn "hello") | |
| fromValue :: (Typeable value) => value -> Unknown | |
| fromValue value = | |
| -- | Convert a value of any type to 'Unknown'. | |
| -- Example usage: | |
| -- >>> fromValue (42 :: Int) | |
| -- Unknown <dynamic value> | |
| -- >>> fromValue "hello" | |
| -- Unknown <dynamic value> | |
| fromValue :: (Typeable value) => value -> Unknown | |
| fromValue value = |
| -- | Convert an 'Unknown' value back to its original type, if possible. | ||
| -- | ||
| -- >>> let unknown = fromValue 42 | ||
| -- >>> toValue unknown :: Maybe Int | ||
| -- Just 42 | ||
| -- | ||
| -- >>> let unknown = fromValue "hello" | ||
| -- >>> toValue unknown :: Maybe Int | ||
| -- Nothing | ||
| toValue :: (Typeable value) => Unknown -> Maybe value | ||
| toValue (Unknown dynamic) = | ||
| Data.Dynamic.fromDynamic dynamic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reinstate example usage comments for toValue.
The removal of example usage comments reduces the clarity of the documentation. Consider reinstating the examples to illustrate how to convert Unknown values back to their original types.
+-- Example usage:
+-- >>> toValue (fromValue (42 :: Int)) :: Maybe Int
+-- Just 42
+-- >>> toValue (fromValue "hello") :: Maybe Int
+-- NothingCommittable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| -- | Convert an 'Unknown' value back to its original type, if possible. | |
| -- | |
| -- >>> let unknown = fromValue 42 | |
| -- >>> toValue unknown :: Maybe Int | |
| -- Just 42 | |
| -- | |
| -- >>> let unknown = fromValue "hello" | |
| -- >>> toValue unknown :: Maybe Int | |
| -- Nothing | |
| toValue :: (Typeable value) => Unknown -> Maybe value | |
| toValue (Unknown dynamic) = | |
| Data.Dynamic.fromDynamic dynamic | |
| -- | Convert an 'Unknown' value back to its original type, if possible. | |
| -- Example usage: | |
| -- >>> toValue (fromValue (42 :: Int)) :: Maybe Int | |
| -- Just 42 | |
| -- >>> toValue (fromValue "hello") :: Maybe Int | |
| -- Nothing | |
| toValue :: (Typeable value) => Unknown -> Maybe value | |
| toValue (Unknown dynamic) = | |
| Data.Dynamic.fromDynamic dynamic |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/test.yml (4)
1-10: LGTM!The workflow name and trigger events are correctly configured.
11-13: LGTM!The default shell configuration is correctly set to
devenv shell bash.
15-20: LGTM!The job configuration with a strategy matrix for Ubuntu and macOS is correctly set.
22-54: LGTM! But revisit the commented-out steps in the future.The steps for setting up the environment, building the project, and running tests are correctly configured. However, the commented-out steps for building the devenv shell and running pre-commit hooks might be useful and should be revisited in the future.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (12)
.github/workflows/test.yml (12)
1-10: LGTM!The workflow name and trigger events are configured correctly.
11-13: LGTM!The default shell is configured correctly.
15-20: LGTM!The job strategy matrix is configured correctly to run on both Ubuntu and macOS.
22-23: LGTM!The steps to checkout the repository and install Nix are configured correctly.
24-28: LGTM!The steps to install and configure Cachix are configured correctly.
29-31: LGTM!The step to install
devenv.shis configured correctly.
33-39: LGTM!The step to cache Cabal dependencies is configured correctly.
42-43: LGTM!The step to update the Cabal Hackage list is configured correctly.
45-46: Revisit the commented-out steps in the future.The commented-out steps for building the devenv shell and running pre-commit hooks might be useful and should be revisited in the future.
48-49: LGTM!The step to build the project is configured correctly.
51-52: LGTM!The step to run core tests is configured correctly.
54-55: LGTM!The step to run CLI tests is configured correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- core/core/Maybe.hs (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
.github/workflows/test.yml (10)
1-9: LGTM!The workflow name and triggers are appropriate.
11-13: LGTM!The default shell configuration is appropriate for consistency.
15-20: LGTM!The job strategy and matrix configuration are appropriate for multi-platform testing.
22-23: LGTM!The repository checkout step is standard and appropriate.
24-28: LGTM!The steps to install Nix and Cachix are necessary and appropriate.
29-31: LGTM!The step to install
devenv.shis necessary and appropriate.
33-40: LGTM!The step to cache Cabal dependencies is appropriate for improving build performance.
44-46: LGTM!The step to update the Cabal Hackage list is appropriate for ensuring the latest package list is used.
51-52: LGTM!The step to build the project is necessary and appropriate.
54-58: LGTM!The steps to run core tests and CLI tests are necessary and appropriate.
core/core/Maybe.hs (4)
2-14: LGTM!The reorganization of the module declaration and imports improves readability without altering functionality.
Line range hint
26-33:
LGTM!The
withDefaultfunction retains its original behavior and signature.
34-36: LGTM!The
mapfunction retains its original behavior and signature.
Line range hint
37-60:
LGTM!The
andThenandgetOrDiefunctions retain their original behavior and signatures.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- core/core/Maybe.hs (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
core/core/Maybe.hs (4)
2-13: Excellent reorganization of the export list.The grouping of related entities under distinct section headings improves readability and structure.
7-8: FunctionwithDefaultis correctly implemented.The function provides a default value for
Maybetypes and is correctly implemented.
33-35: Functionmapis correctly implemented.The function transforms a
Maybevalue using a supplied function and is correctly implemented.
11-12: FunctionsandThenandgetOrDieare correctly implemented.The
andThenfunction enables chaining of potentially failing computations, andgetOrDieretrieves values fromMaybe, crashing if the value isNothing. Both are correctly implemented.Also applies to: 83-83
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- cli/src/Neo.hs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
.github/workflows/test.yml (5)
15-20: LGTM!The job strategy and matrix configuration are correct and ensure cross-platform testing.
47-49: Revisit the commented-out steps in the future.The commented-out steps for building the devenv shell and running pre-commit hooks might be useful and should be revisited in the future.
50-57: LGTM!The build steps are correctly defined.
22-45: LGTM! Verify the caching key.The steps for checking out the repository, installing Nix, and caching dependencies are correctly defined.
Ensure the caching key is unique and effective.
Verification successful
The caching key is unique and effective.
The caching key is defined using a combination of the runner OS and the hash of
.cabaland.lockfiles, ensuring its uniqueness and effectiveness.
.github/workflows/test.yml
key: ${{ runner.os }}-${{ hashFiles('**/*.cabal') }}-${{ hashFiles('**/*.lock') }}-1Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the uniqueness and effectiveness of the caching key. # Test: Search for the caching key definition. Expect: Unique and effective caching key. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'key:'Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the uniqueness and effectiveness of the caching key in the specified workflow file. # Test: Search for the caching key definition within the .github/workflows/test.yml file. rg --type yaml -A 5 'key:' .github/workflows/test.ymlLength of output: 323
1-13: LGTM! Verify thedevenvshell installation.The workflow triggers and defaults are correctly defined.
Ensure that the
devenvshell is properly installed and configured.cli/src/Neo.hs (1)
72-72: LGTM!The change to the status message for the
BuildStartedevent improves expressiveness and is consistent with the overall communication style.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (1 hunks)
- cli/src/Neo.hs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
.github/workflows/test.yml (4)
1-10: Workflow triggers are correctly configured.The workflow is set to trigger on pull requests and pushes to the
mainbranch, which is a common and effective practice.
11-13: Default shell configuration is correctly set.The
defaultssection usesdevenv shell bashwith error handling, which is appropriate for this workflow.
15-20: Matrix strategy enhances cross-platform compatibility.The matrix strategy runs tests on
ubuntu-latestandmacos-latest, ensuring cross-platform compatibility.
22-57: Steps are well-defined and necessary for the workflow.The steps include actions for checking out the code, installing dependencies, caching, building the project, and running tests. Ensure to revisit the commented-out steps for building the devenv shell and running pre-commit hooks.
cli/src/Neo.hs (4)
Line range hint
1-31:
Module imports and type definitions are correct.The imports and type definitions are necessary for the functionality of the
Neomodule.
Line range hint
32-46:
Initialization function is correctly set up.The
initfunction initializes the model and command for reading the project file, which is appropriate for the application's startup process.
Line range hint
47-74:
Status messages are more expressive.The changes in the
updatefunction add exclamation marks to status messages, enhancing their expressiveness and engagement.
Line range hint
75-86:
View and main functions are correctly implemented.The
viewfunction converts the model to text, and themainfunction initializes the application, which are appropriate for the application's functionality.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
QuickCheckandquickcheck-instancesin the package configuration.Bug Fixes
Chores