Release CU: stage-batch5 — 2-PR low-risk batch (v0.51.123) — gzip+ETag static caching / Open in VS Code#2816
Merged
Merged
Conversation
) Right-click any workspace file, folder, or root now shows 'Open in VS Code' alongside the existing Reveal in File Manager action. - POST /api/file/open-vscode: resolves path via safe_resolve, finds VS Code via shutil.which() with fallbacks for macOS (/usr/local/bin/code, app bundle CLI), Linux (/usr/bin/code, /snap/bin/code), and Windows (%LOCALAPPDATA% and %PROGRAMFILES% user/system installs). Returns a descriptive error if not found rather than a bare OS error. - Optional vscode block in config.yaml: command (default: code), host_path_prefix + container_path_prefix for Docker path mapping. - i18n: open_in_vscode and open_in_vscode_failed translated in all 10 locales (it, ja, ru, es, de, zh-CN, zh-TW, pt, ko). - 26 tests in tests/test_2735_open_in_vscode.py covering source wiring, command resolution, i18n completeness, and live endpoint error paths.
…isk batch) Cherry-picked PRs: - #2779 (v2psv) — gzip + ETag/304 + immutable cache for fingerprinted /static/* - #2787 (munim) — Open in VS Code workspace file browser action (closes #2735) Conflict resolution: kept ours CHANGELOG (3 PRs all added Unreleased entries). For #2779's _serve_static overhaul, took theirs (PR replaces function body). Folded missing 'import gzip' into the #2779 commit via fixup+autosquash.
This was referenced May 24, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Release CU — v0.51.123 — stage-batch5 — 2-PR low-risk batch
Fifth batch from the May 24 sweep. Two well-tested contributor PRs, both pre-cleared by Opus advisor:
api/routes.py_serve_static()/static/*scope, in-process cache with(size, mtime_ns)invalidation, 11 testsapi/routes.py+static/ui.js+ i18nsafe_resolvetraversal guard, 26 testsCherry-picks
Conflict resolution + cherry-pick fix-ups
PR #2779's cherry-pick onto current master had a real merge conflict in
_serve_static()because the function body was entirely rewritten. Resolution:no-storewfile.write(raw)impl with the new cachedwfile.write(body)impl)wfile.write(raw)was left from master; corrected towfile.write(body)so gzipped content is actually transmittedimport gzipatapi/routes.py:9into the contributor's commit viagit rebase --autosquashPre-Opus gate
ast.parse+node -con all touchedOpus advisor verdict
What's NOT in this batch
Routed to Batch 6 (Windows stack rebase) or held for review: