Mlserver example #1110
Mlserver example #1110
Conversation
robertgshaw2-redhat
requested review from
InquestGeronimo,
bfineran,
markurtz and
mgoin
|
|
||
| NUM_THREADS = 2 | ||
| URL = "http://localhost:8080/v2/models/text-classification-model/infer" | ||
| sentences = ["I hate using GPUs for inference", "I love using DeepSparse on CPUs"] * 100 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should * 100 be * NUM_THREADS if we are taking only sentences[:NUM_THREADS] elements?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rsnm2 see suggestion below
| @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ | |||
| # **Step 1: Installation** | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
best to add an intro paragraph to give users a heads up of what this example does.
| threads = [threading.Thread(target=tfunc, args=(sentence,)) for sentence in sentences[:NUM_THREADS]] | ||
| for thread in threads: | ||
| thread.start() | ||
| for thread in threads: | ||
| thread.join() No newline at end of file |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
it looks like this creates NUM_THREADS threads to make the request, is that intended?
Might make more sense to create len(sentences) threads and execute NUM_THREADS at a time.
You can do this out of the box with ThreadPoolExecutor with something like:
| threads = [threading.Thread(target=tfunc, args=(sentence,)) for sentence in sentences[:NUM_THREADS]] | |
| for thread in threads: | |
| thread.start() | |
| for thread in threads: | |
| thread.join() | |
| from concurrent.futures.thread import ThreadPoolExecutor | |
| threadpool = ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=NUM_THREADS) | |
| results = threadpool.map(tfunc, sentences) |
| URL = "http://localhost:8080/v2/models/text-classification-model/infer" | ||
| sentences = ["I hate using GPUs for inference", "I love using DeepSparse on CPUs"] * 100 | ||
|
|
||
| def tfunc(text): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would rename to something more descriptive like inference_request
| for output in resp["outputs"]: | ||
| print(output["data"]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
executing a list printout while multithreaded may cause a race condition, any reason to not return the value and print in sequence at the end? (ie consider thread 1 and thread 2 happen to execute exactly at the same time, they will print their lines at the same time and might not tell which is which)
|
|
||
| NUM_THREADS = 2 | ||
| URL = "http://localhost:8080/v2/models/text-classification-model/infer" | ||
| sentences = ["I hate using GPUs for inference", "I love using DeepSparse on CPUs"] * 100 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@rsnm2 see suggestion below
| @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | |||
| import requests, threading | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
would suggest a few in line comments for self-documentation
| task = self._settings.parameters.task, | ||
| model_path = self._settings.parameters.model_path, | ||
| batch_size = self._settings.parameters.batch_size, | ||
| sequence_length = self._settings.parameters.sequence_length, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is there a place for generic kwargs in the settings? Would be cool if we could use that instead to dump extra pipeline args so we can get full generic pipeline support out of the box
| @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | |||
| from mlserver import MLModel | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is great, love that it works out of the box - let's throw in the serving command as a comment just for convenience
|
Per the main README announcement, DeepSparse is being deprecated by June 2, 2025. Closing the PR as work has been suspended; thank you for the inputs and support! |
5 participants
No description provided.