Skip to content

Conversation

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member

From @edmundmiller

Perfect feel free to cut 0.7.0!

@SPPearce
Copy link

Um, why is this 0.7.0 from 0.3.0/0.3.1 (depending on which file you look at here)?

@maxulysse
Copy link
Member Author

Um, why is this 0.7.0 from 0.3.0/0.3.1 (depending on which file you look at here)?

Because Edmund said: Perfect feel free to cut 0.7.0!

Copy link
Contributor

@edmundmiller edmundmiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

#19

Got it mixed up with 0.0.7 from nft-utils 🤦🏻

Should be 0.3.1 unless there's been any new functionality.

@edmundmiller edmundmiller changed the title Release candidate 0.7.0 Bump versions for 0.4.0 Oct 31, 2025
@edmundmiller edmundmiller added this to the 0.4.0 milestone Oct 31, 2025
@edmundmiller
Copy link
Contributor

0.4.0 actually, I think there was a bug with the plugin publishing when I tried to publish 0.3.1, I'll fix that one later.

@edmundmiller edmundmiller merged commit 27ce7ac into main Oct 31, 2025
3 checks passed
@edmundmiller edmundmiller deleted the rc_0.7.0 branch October 31, 2025 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants