Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MNT: Update ruff to 0.8.2 #1389

Closed

Conversation

DimitriPapadopoulos
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos marked this pull request as draft November 24, 2024 19:23
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.03%. Comparing base (5aca3f2) to head (71d2d98).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1389      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.34%   95.03%   -0.31%     
==========================================
  Files         208      207       -1     
  Lines       29768    29671      -97     
  Branches     3355     3014     -341     
==========================================
- Hits        28381    28199     -182     
- Misses        948      999      +51     
- Partials      439      473      +34     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos marked this pull request as ready for review November 27, 2024 09:56
@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos force-pushed the ruff_0.8.0 branch 2 times, most recently from 78c8869 to 386b6ee Compare December 11, 2024 09:45
@DimitriPapadopoulos DimitriPapadopoulos changed the title MNT: Update ruff to 0.8.0 MNT: Update ruff to 0.8.2 Dec 11, 2024
@effigies
Copy link
Member

@DimitriPapadopoulos Is any of this still undone from #1405?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants