Bump IREE requirement pins to 3.3.0rc20250215

[shark-pr-automator]

Diff: iree-org/iree@iree-3.3.0rc20250213...iree-3.3.0rc20250215

IREE bump duty engineer this week: @renxida

Auto-generated by GitHub Actions using .github/workflows/update_iree_requirement_pins.yml.

[renxida]

FAILED sharktank/tests/models/vae/vae_test.py::VaeFluxDecoderTest::testCompareBF16EagerVsHuggingface - RuntimeError: Given groups=1, weight of size [512, 16, 3, 3], expected input[1, 1, 4096, 64] to have 16 channels, but got 1 channels instead
FAILED sharktank/tests/models/vae/vae_test.py::VaeFluxDecoderTest::testCompareF32EagerVsHuggingface - RuntimeError: Given groups=1, weight of size [512, 16, 3, 3], expected input[1, 1, 4096, 64] to have 16 channels, but got 1 channels instead
FAILED sharktank/tests/models/vae/vae_test.py::VaeFluxDecoderTest::testVaeIreeVsHuggingFace - RuntimeError: Given groups=1, weight of size [512, 16, 3, 3], expected input[1, 1, 4096, 64] to have 16 channels, but got 1 channels instead

Did we change the shape handling for something here?

[marbre]

FAILED sharktank/tests/models/vae/vae_test.py::VaeFluxDecoderTest::testCompareBF16EagerVsHuggingface - RuntimeError: Given groups=1, weight of size [512, 16, 3, 3], expected input[1, 1, 4096, 64] to have 16 channels, but got 1 channels instead
FAILED sharktank/tests/models/vae/vae_test.py::VaeFluxDecoderTest::testCompareF32EagerVsHuggingface - RuntimeError: Given groups=1, weight of size [512, 16, 3, 3], expected input[1, 1, 4096, 64] to have 16 channels, but got 1 channels instead
FAILED sharktank/tests/models/vae/vae_test.py::VaeFluxDecoderTest::testVaeIreeVsHuggingFace - RuntimeError: Given groups=1, weight of size [512, 16, 3, 3], expected input[1, 1, 4096, 64] to have 16 channels, but got 1 channels instead

Did we change the shape handling for something here?

Do you follow up here or have investigated further @renxida?

[marbre]

Seems the test failure is unrelated to the IREE version bump, I filled #982 for this.

[marbre]

The issue was fixed in the shark-ai repo and were not related to the IREE version. Thus, we could merge this as is or directly try to bump to a newer version. @ScottTodd wdyt?

[ScottTodd]

Incremental update is fine.

[ScottTodd]

(We may still want to change the action to set the PR title to reflect the specific commit though, since this no longer has the "latest versions")

[renxida]

#996 implements the version-in-title change