Skip to content

src: start using ncrypto for CSPRNG calls - #53984

Merged
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
jasnell:start-using-ncrypto
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

src: start using ncrypto for CSPRNG calls#53984
nodejs-github-bot merged 1 commit into
nodejs:mainfrom
jasnell:start-using-ncrypto

Conversation

@jasnell

@jasnell jasnell commented Jul 21, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

@jasnell
jasnell requested review from anonrig and tniessen July 21, 2024 21:09
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/crypto
  • @nodejs/startup

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Jul 21, 2024
@jasnell jasnell added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 21, 2024
@jasnell
jasnell force-pushed the start-using-ncrypto branch from 4df80ae to 6fd9b19 Compare July 21, 2024 21:12
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 21, 2024
@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the request-ci-failed Starting CI with the request-ci label failed and requires manual intervention. label Jul 21, 2024
Comment thread src/node.cc
@anonrig anonrig added request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. and removed request-ci-failed Starting CI with the request-ci label failed and requires manual intervention. labels Jul 21, 2024
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Jul 21, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@tniessen
tniessen requested a review from bnoordhuis July 22, 2024 11:32
@tniessen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

FWIW, this partially undoes @bnoordhuis's attempt at making this more difficult to misuse (see https://github.com/nodejs-private/node-private/pull/346#discussion_r967795383 if you have access).

@jasnell

jasnell commented Jul 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

FWIW, this partially undoes @bnoordhuis's attempt at making this more difficult to misuse

I never really agreed that that made any real difference one way or the other but if folks feel strongly about it I can retain that.

@nodejs-github-bot

nodejs-github-bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jasnell jasnell added commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. and removed needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Jul 22, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue PRs queued for automated landing through the Commit Queue. label Jul 23, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
nodejs-github-bot merged commit c112b4b into nodejs:main Jul 23, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Landed in c112b4b

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2024
PR-URL: #53984
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
@RafaelGSS RafaelGSS mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2024
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2024
PR-URL: #53984
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Ethan Arrowood <ethan@arrowood.dev>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

author ready PRs with CI started, the required approvals, and no outstanding review comments. c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. lib / src Issues and PRs involving general changes in the lib/ or src/ directories.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants