test: fix assert.equal to strictEq - #9999
Closed
mfhan wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2016
Member
lpinca
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2016
Member
Member
|
Landed in 5a41a72. Thanks! |
lpinca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2016
* use assert.strictEqual() instead of assert.equal() PR-URL: #9999 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
italoacasas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2016
* use assert.strictEqual() instead of assert.equal() PR-URL: #9999 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Merged
cjihrig
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 20, 2016
* use assert.strictEqual() instead of assert.equal() PR-URL: #9999 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2017
* use assert.strictEqual() instead of assert.equal() PR-URL: #9999 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
* use assert.strictEqual() instead of assert.equal() PR-URL: #9999 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
* use assert.strictEqual() instead of assert.equal() PR-URL: #9999 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
9 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
make -j4 testpassesAffected core subsystem: test
On line 10: changed assert.equal to "assert.strictEqual(bytes, buf1.length + buf2.length);"