Migrate to eslint 9 #3
Conversation
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve the removal and addition of several configuration files related to ESLint and TypeScript, along with updates to the project’s dependency management and build processes. Key modifications include the introduction of new ESLint configurations, the setup of Dependabot for automated dependency updates, and the restructuring of the Changes
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/import.ts (1)
1-1: Consider removing the commented-out lines if not needed.The commented-out lines 1 and 6 suggest that the
eslint-plugin-importplugin is not being used directly. If this is intentional and the lines are not needed, consider removing them to avoid confusion and improve code clarity.Apply this diff to remove the commented-out lines:
-// import importPlugin from "eslint-plugin-import"; export default [ { plugins: { - // import: importPlugin, }, rules: { "import/order": ["error", {Also applies to: 6-6
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (22)
- .eslintrc (0 hunks)
- .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-package.yml (1 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .npmrc (1 hunks)
- base.js (0 hunks)
- eslint.config.js (1 hunks)
- global.d.ts (1 hunks)
- index.js (0 hunks)
- jsx.js (0 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/base.ts (1 hunks)
- src/import.ts (1 hunks)
- src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/jsx-a11y.ts (1 hunks)
- src/react.ts (1 hunks)
- src/stylistic.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typescript.ts (1 hunks)
- src/unused-imports.ts (1 hunks)
- stylistic.js (0 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
- typescript.js (0 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (6)
- .eslintrc
- base.js
- index.js
- jsx.js
- stylistic.js
- typescript.js
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .gitignore
- .npmrc
- global.d.ts
Additional comments not posted (29)
.github/dependabot.yml (1)
1-8: LGTM!The Dependabot configuration file is set up correctly:
- The
versionis set to 2, which is the latest version of the configuration file format.- The
updatessection is correctly defined with thepackage-ecosystemset to "npm" and thedirectoryset to "/".- The
schedulesection is correctly defined with theintervalset to "daily".- The
assigneessection is correctly defined with the user "omermecitoglu" assigned to manage the updates.This configuration will enable Dependabot to automatically check for dependency updates daily and create pull requests for any available updates. The assigned user will be notified of any updates and will be responsible for reviewing and merging the pull requests.
This setup will help keep the project's dependencies up-to-date and reduce the risk of security vulnerabilities and compatibility issues.
eslint.config.js (3)
1-2: LGTM!The import statement is correctly importing the rules from the distribution module.
3-4: LGTM!The ESLint configuration is correctly exported as an array, combining the imported rules with a custom rule set.
5-9: LGTM!The custom rule set is correctly defined, enforcing the sorting of object keys in ascending order. This rule helps maintain code consistency and improves readability by ensuring object keys are organized in a predictable manner.
The rule options are appropriately specified:
"error"indicates that violations of this rule will be reported as errors."asc"specifies that the keys should be sorted in ascending order.{ caseSensitive: true, natural: false }configures the rule to be case-sensitive and use non-natural sorting.These options align with the goal of promoting a consistent and readable code style.
src/unused-imports.ts (1)
1-16: LGTM! The configuration looks good and follows best practices.The
eslint-plugin-unused-importsplugin is a great addition to the ESLint setup. It helps maintain a clean codebase by enforcing rules related to unused imports and variables.Here are some key benefits of using this plugin:
Identifying unused imports: The
no-unused-importsrule set to "error" will raise an error whenever there are unused imports in the codebase. This helps in removing unnecessary code and keeps the codebase tidy.Highlighting unused variables: The
no-unused-varsrule set to "warn" will issue warnings for unused variables. This is useful for identifying variables that are declared but never used, allowing developers to clean up their code.Flexibility with unused parameters: The
args: "after-used"option allows for unused arguments in functions if they come after used arguments. This provides flexibility in function parameter declarations.Ignoring intentionally unused variables: The
argsIgnorePatternandvarsIgnorePatternoptions allow for ignoring unused arguments and variables that start with an underscore. This is a common convention for intentionally unused parameters or variables, and it prevents unnecessary warnings.Overall, this configuration promotes better coding practices, improves code maintainability, and helps catch potential issues related to unused code.
src/index.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM!The imports are well-organized and cover various aspects of the codebase, such as base rules, stylistic conventions, TypeScript, React, accessibility, import statements, and unused imports. This modular approach allows for better maintainability and extensibility of the ESLint configuration.
9-17: LGTM!The export statement consolidates all the imported configurations into a single array using the spread operator. This approach provides a unified configuration that can be easily imported and utilized elsewhere in the application. It enhances modularity and maintainability by allowing developers to manage and apply multiple sets of rules or configurations in a streamlined manner.
src/import.ts (1)
1-21: LGTM! The file structure and purpose are well-defined.The file exports a default array containing a single configuration object that specifies plugins and rules for organizing imports. The configuration includes the
import/orderrule, which enforces a specific order for import statements based on predefined groups, allows for case-sensitive alphabetical ordering, and defines a path group for internal imports.This setup aims to enhance code readability and maintainability by ensuring a consistent structure for import statements across the codebase.
src/react.ts (4)
6-6: LGTM!The
filessection correctly specifies the file extensions for JavaScript and TypeScript files, including JSX and different module formats. The glob pattern ensures that the configuration applies to files in all directories and subdirectories.
7-16: LGTM!The
languageOptionssection correctly sets up global variables for browser environments using theglobalspackage. Enabling JSX syntax in theparserOptionsis necessary for React projects. The configuration looks good.
17-19: LGTM!The
pluginssection correctly includes theeslint-plugin-reactplugin, which is essential for linting React code and enforcing best practices. The configuration looks good.
20-26: LGTM!The
rulessection correctly defines thereact/jsx-no-literalsrule with an error severity. Allowing specific strings, such as "©", provides flexibility for commonly used entities or special characters. The rule enhances code quality by preventing the use of arbitrary string literals in JSX. The configuration looks good..github/workflows/release-package.yml (2)
18-19: LGTM!Uncommenting the step to install dependencies is necessary for building and publishing the package. The
npm installcommand is the correct way to install the required dependencies.
24-25: LGTM!Uncommenting the step to build the package is necessary before publishing it to NPM. The
npm run buildcommand is the correct way to trigger the build process defined in thepackage.jsonfile.tsconfig.json (5)
2-22: LGTM!The
compilerOptionsconfiguration looks good. It enables strict type checking, targets the latest ECMAScript version, and allows JavaScript files to be compiled alongside TypeScript files. The options are set to optimize for modern JavaScript development and ensure type safety.
19-21: LGTM!The
pathsmapping is a nice addition. It allows for simplified imports from thesrcdirectory using a tilde (~) prefix, which can help keep import statements clean and consistent throughout the project.
23-25: LGTM!The
includeconfiguration looks good. It ensures that all TypeScript files in the project are included in the compilation, which is a common pattern.
26-29: LGTM!The
excludeconfiguration looks good. Excluding thenode_modulesdirectory is a common pattern, as it contains third-party dependencies that don't need to be compiled. Excluding theconfigsdirectory suggests that it contains configuration files that don't need to be compiled.
1-30: Great work on thetsconfig.jsonfile!The TypeScript configuration file is comprehensive and well-structured. It includes a good set of compiler options that enable strict type checking, target the latest ECMAScript version, and allow JavaScript files to be compiled alongside TypeScript files.
The path mapping for simplified imports is a nice touch, and the
includeandexcludeconfigurations follow common patterns and best practices.Overall, the
tsconfig.jsonfile sets up a solid foundation for a modern and type-safe TypeScript project. Well done!src/base.ts (1)
1-28: Excellent work on the ESLint configuration!The configuration looks great and covers a wide range of best practices and potential issues. The rules are well-chosen and will help enforce a consistent coding style and catch potential issues early in the development process.
A few additional suggestions for improvement:
- Consider adding rules for enforcing consistent naming conventions (e.g.,
camelcasefor variables and functions,PascalCasefor classes).- Consider adding rules for enforcing consistent formatting (e.g.,
indent,quotes,semi).- Consider adding rules for enforcing best practices around error handling (e.g.,
no-throw-literal,no-catch-shadow).- Consider adding rules for enforcing best practices around async/await (e.g.,
no-return-await,no-await-in-loop).Overall, this is a solid configuration that will help improve code quality and maintainability. Great job!
src/typescript.ts (1)
1-38: Excellent ESLint configuration for TypeScript projects!The provided ESLint configuration is well-structured and comprehensive, ensuring high code quality and maintainability in TypeScript projects. Here are some key highlights:
- Extending the recommended rules from
typescript-eslintprovides a solid foundation of widely accepted best practices.- Specifying the applicable files and setting up the parser options ensures that the configuration is applied consistently across all TypeScript files.
- The defined rules cover various aspects of TypeScript development, such as type consistency, error prevention, and code style. This promotes a clean and reliable codebase.
- The use of different severity levels ("error" and "warn") allows for fine-grained control over rule violations, enabling a balance between strictness and flexibility.
- Turning off specific rules, such as
@typescript-eslint/no-unused-varsandclass-methods-use-this, provides flexibility in scenarios where these rules may not be applicable or desired.Overall, this ESLint configuration sets a strong foundation for maintaining a high-quality TypeScript codebase. Great job!
package.json (7)
3-3: LGTM!The major version increment aligns with the significant changes made in the package, such as the updated dependencies and the introduction of the exports field.
6-7: LGTM!The added keywords enhance the package's discoverability and accurately describe its purpose as a shareable ESLint configuration.
9-16: LGTM!The added repository, bugs, and homepage metadata provide valuable information for users to access the source code, report issues, and view the package's documentation. This enhances the package's visibility and maintainability.
21-25: LGTM!The restructured author object provides more comprehensive information about the package author, including their email and URL. This enhances the package's professionalism and credibility.
27-51: LGTM!The use of ECMAScript modules, the updated main entry point, and the introduction of the exports field are positive changes that enhance the package's modularity, flexibility, and alignment with modern JavaScript development practices.
53-53: LGTM!Including the entire
dist/directory in the files array simplifies the package distribution and ensures that all the necessary distribution files are included when the package is published.
60-74: LGTM!The updated eslint peer dependency ensures compatibility with the latest ESLint releases. The updated dependencies bring new features and improvements to the package, such as added support for React-specific linting rules. The expanded devDependencies section enhances the package's development experience and type safety.
src/stylistic.ts (1)
4-123: LGTM!The ESLint configuration object is comprehensive and well-structured. It covers a wide range of code style aspects and follows common best practices. The use of the
@stylistic/eslint-pluginensures that the rules are well-maintained and up to date.Some notable aspects of the configuration:
- It enforces consistent spacing and indentation rules, promoting readability.
- It handles various edge cases and specific scenarios, such as JSX formatting and arrow function parentheses.
- It allows some flexibility where appropriate, such as disabling the
@stylistic/no-extra-parensrule.- It sets reasonable limits for line length and empty lines.
Overall, this configuration will help maintain a clean and consistent codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
src/unused-imports.ts (1)
9-15: LGTM: Rules are well-defined, with a suggestion for consideration.The rule definitions are comprehensive and follow good practices:
unused-imports/no-unused-importsset to "error" ensures a clean codebase.unused-imports/no-unused-varsset to "warn" with specific configurations provides flexibility while still highlighting potential issues.The configuration for ignoring variables and arguments starting with underscore is a common and useful convention.
Consider setting
unused-imports/no-unused-varsto "error" instead of "warn" for stricter enforcement. This change would align with theno-unused-importsrule and further improve code quality. Here's the suggested change:rules: { "unused-imports/no-unused-imports": "error", "unused-imports/no-unused-vars": [ - "warn", + "error", { args: "after-used", argsIgnorePattern: "^_", vars: "all", varsIgnorePattern: "^_" }, ], },src/index.ts (2)
10-18: LGTM: Well-structured default export with a minor suggestion.The default export effectively combines all the imported configurations into a single array, which is then correctly typed as
Linter.Config[]. This structure allows for easy consumption of the entire ESLint configuration.Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of the order in which the configurations are spread into the array, as ESLint applies rules in the order they appear. This would help future maintainers understand if the current order is intentional and why.
1-18: Well-structured configuration aggregator with room for future enhancements.The overall structure of this file is clean and effective. It serves its purpose of aggregating multiple ESLint configurations into a single, easily importable module. The use of TypeScript for type safety is commendable.
For future considerations:
- As the project grows, you might want to add comments explaining the purpose of each configuration module and why they're included.
- Consider adding a mechanism for environment-specific configurations (e.g., development vs production) if needed in the future.
- If certain rules need to be conditionally applied based on project settings, you could introduce a factory function that generates the configuration array based on input parameters.
src/import.ts (1)
9-19: LGTM: Import order rule is well-configured, with a suggestion for improvement.The import order rule configuration is comprehensive and follows best practices. It includes case-sensitive alphabetization, a well-defined group order, and a custom path group for internal imports.
However, I have a suggestion to improve the internal import pattern:
Consider making the internal import pattern more specific to your project structure. The current pattern "~/**" might be too broad. For example, if your internal modules are in a specific directory, you could use something like:
pathGroups: [ - { group: "internal", pattern: "~/**" }, + { group: "internal", pattern: "@internal/**" }, ],This assumes your internal modules are in a directory that can be referenced with "@internal". Adjust the pattern to match your project's specific structure.
src/react.ts (3)
8-17: Language options look good, but consider specifying a parser.The language options are well-configured:
- Browser globals are correctly included, which is appropriate for most React projects.
- JSX syntax is enabled in the parser options, which is necessary for React.
However, I noticed that a specific parser isn't specified. For React projects, especially those using TypeScript, it's often beneficial to use
@typescript-eslint/parser.Consider adding a parser specification to the configuration. Here's a suggested addition:
languageOptions: { globals: { ...globals.browser, }, + parser: "@typescript-eslint/parser", parserOptions: { ecmaFeatures: { jsx: true, }, + ecmaVersion: "latest", + sourceType: "module", }, },This change ensures that TypeScript syntax is correctly parsed and adds some additional useful parser options.
18-20: Good inclusion of 'react' plugin, consider additional plugins for enhanced linting.The inclusion of the 'eslint-plugin-react' is correct and necessary for React-specific linting rules.
For a more comprehensive React linting setup, consider adding these additional plugins:
eslint-plugin-react-hooks: Enforces the Rules of Hooks.eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y: Checks accessibility rules on JSX elements.@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin: If you're using TypeScript.Here's how you might include these:
plugins: { react, + "react-hooks": require("eslint-plugin-react-hooks"), + "jsx-a11y": require("eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y"), + "@typescript-eslint": require("@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin"), },Remember to also add the corresponding rules for these plugins in the
rulessection if you decide to include them.
21-27: Consider expanding the rule set for more comprehensive linting.The inclusion of the 'react/jsx-no-literals' rule is a good start, as it can help enforce best practices for internationalization. However, the current configuration allowing only '©' as a literal might be overly restrictive for many projects.
You might want to reconsider the allowed strings for 'react/jsx-no-literals' based on your project's needs.
Consider adding more React-specific rules. Here are some suggestions:
rules: { "react/jsx-no-literals": ["error", { allowedStrings: [ "©", // Add more allowed strings as needed ], }], "react/prop-types": "error", "react/jsx-key": "error", "react/no-unused-state": "warn", "react/jsx-no-bind": ["warn", { allowArrowFunctions: true, allowFunctions: false, allowBind: false, }], "react/no-deprecated": "error", // Add more rules as needed },
- If you decide to add the suggested plugins from the previous comment, you should also include their recommended rules:
rules: { // ... existing rules "react-hooks/rules-of-hooks": "error", "react-hooks/exhaustive-deps": "warn", "jsx-a11y/alt-text": "error", "jsx-a11y/anchor-has-content": "error", // ... more jsx-a11y rules "@typescript-eslint/explicit-function-return-type": "warn", "@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any": "warn", // ... more @typescript-eslint rules },Remember to adjust these rules based on your specific project requirements and team preferences.
.github/workflows/release.yml (3)
13-20: Consider specifying a more precise Node.js version.The current setup looks good, but using 'latest' for the Node.js version might lead to unexpected behavior if a new Node.js version is released with breaking changes.
Consider specifying a more precise version or version range. For example:
- node-version: 'latest' + node-version: '18.x' # or another appropriate versionThis ensures consistency across different runs of the workflow while still allowing for minor version updates.
36-40: Consider adding a semantic-release configuration file.The semantic-release step is correctly set up with the necessary tokens. However, to ensure consistent and customized release behavior, it's recommended to add a configuration file.
Create a
.releaserc.jsonfile in your repository root with your desired configuration. For example:{ "branches": ["main"], "plugins": [ "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer", "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator", "@semantic-release/npm", "@semantic-release/github" ] }This allows you to explicitly define the release behavior and ensures consistency across different environments.
1-40: Overall, good workflow structure with room for improvement.The workflow covers the main steps required for a release process, which is great. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
- Implement testing steps before the release (as mentioned in a previous comment).
- Consider adding caching for the build output to speed up subsequent runs.
- You might want to add conditional steps to avoid unnecessary work. For example, only run the release step if tests pass and there are changes to release.
Here's an example of how you could implement caching for the build output:
- name: Cache build uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: dist # adjust this to your build output directory key: ${{ runner.os }}-build-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-build- - name: Build package run: npm run buildAnd here's how you could make the release step conditional:
- name: Run semantic-release if: success() && github.event_name == 'push' env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} NPM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }} run: npx semantic-releaseThese changes will make your workflow more efficient and robust.
package.json (3)
3-3: Approve major version bump to 2.0.0The increment to version 2.0.0 is appropriate given the significant changes, particularly the update to ESLint 9 in peer dependencies.
Consider adding a CHANGELOG.md file or updating the existing one to document the breaking changes introduced in this version.
67-68: Approve script changes and suggest improvementThe addition of the "build" script using TypeScript compiler (tsc) is appropriate for generating the compiled distribution.
Consider adding a "prepublishOnly" script that runs both build and lint to ensure the package is properly prepared before publishing:
"scripts": { "build": "tsc", "lint": "eslint", "prepublishOnly": "npm run build && npm run lint" }
71-71: Approve ESLint peer dependency update and suggest documentationUpdating the ESLint peer dependency to version 9 or higher is consistent with the package's major version bump.
Ensure that the README.md or documentation is updated to reflect this change in ESLint version requirement. Also, consider mentioning any breaking changes or migration steps for users upgrading from the previous version.
README.md (3)
27-27: Update to ESLint 9 flat config systemThe README now mentions
eslint.config.jsoreslint.config.mjsas the configuration file names, reflecting the new flat config system introduced in ESLint 9. This is a significant change from the previous.eslintrc.*files.Consider adding a note explaining this change for users upgrading from older versions, such as:
"Note: ESLint 9 introduces a new flat config system. If you're upgrading from an older version, you'll need to migrate your
.eslintrc.*configuration to the neweslint.config.jsoreslint.config.mjsformat."
30-40: Approve new usage example with ES modules syntaxThe new usage example correctly demonstrates the flat config system introduced in ESLint 9, using ES modules syntax. It effectively shows how to import and spread the configuration, and includes a placeholder for additional rules.
To further improve the example, consider adding a comment explaining the spread operator for less experienced users:
import omer from "@omer-x/eslint-config"; export default [ ...omer, // Spread the imported configuration { rules: { // Add your custom rules here to override or extend the imported configuration }, }, ];
42-66: Approve addition of individual component usage exampleThe new example effectively demonstrates how to import and use individual components of the ESLint configuration. This provides users with more flexibility in customizing their setup.
To enhance this section:
- Consider adding a brief explanation of each component's purpose at the beginning of this section.
- Add a note about the importance of component order:
"Note: The order in which you spread the components may affect rule precedence. Components listed later in the array will override conflicting rules from earlier components."
This will help users understand how to effectively combine and prioritize different rule sets.
src/stylistic.ts (1)
9-123: Consider adding documentation for certain rules.While the rules are well-defined, some might benefit from additional explanation or justification, especially for team members who might be new to these conventions. Consider adding comments for rules that:
- Deviate from common defaults
- Have complex configurations
- Are specific to your project's needs
For example, you could add a comment explaining the rationale behind the
"@stylistic/jsx-curly-brace-presence"rule configuration.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
- .github/workflows/release-package.yml (0 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- global.d.ts (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/base.ts (1 hunks)
- src/import.ts (1 hunks)
- src/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/jsx-a11y.ts (1 hunks)
- src/react.ts (1 hunks)
- src/stylistic.ts (1 hunks)
- src/typescript.ts (1 hunks)
- src/unused-imports.ts (1 hunks)
- tsconfig.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/release-package.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- global.d.ts
- tsconfig.json
🔇 Additional comments (32)
src/jsx-a11y.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are correct and well-structured.The imports are appropriate for the ESLint configuration with jsx-a11y. Good job on importing the Linter type for better type checking.
4-6: LGTM: Well-structured ESLint configuration.The configuration array is well-structured, combining the recommended jsx-a11y rules with custom overrides. This approach allows for easy maintenance and extension of the ESLint setup.
Also applies to: 10-11
7-9: Consider using theignoreNonDOMoption for thejsx-a11y/no-autofocusrule.Instead of turning off the
jsx-a11y/no-autofocusrule globally, consider using theignoreNonDOMoption to allow autofocus on non-DOM elements. This approach ensures that accessibility standards are maintained while accommodating specific use cases.Apply this diff to update the configuration:
rules: { - "jsx-a11y/no-autofocus": "off", + "jsx-a11y/no-autofocus": ["error", { ignoreNonDOM: true }], },
11-11: LGTM: Proper type assertion for ESLint configuration.The type assertion to
Linter.Config[]is correct and helps ensure type safety. This will catch potential configuration errors at compile-time, which is a good practice.src/unused-imports.ts (5)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are correctly defined.The import statements are properly structured, importing the necessary plugin and type definition for the ESLint configuration.
4-17: LGTM: Configuration export structure is correct.The configuration is exported as an array, which is a good practice for potential future extensibility. The single configuration object within the array follows the correct ESLint configuration structure.
6-8: LGTM: Plugin is correctly configured.The
unused-importsplugin is properly specified in thepluginssection, allowing ESLint to utilize the rules defined by this plugin.
17-17: LGTM: Type assertion enhances type safety.The type assertion
as Linter.Config[]ensures type safety for the ESLint configuration. This practice improves IDE support and helps catch potential configuration errors early in the development process.
1-17: Overall assessment: Well-implemented ESLint configuration for unused imports.This new file introduces a robust ESLint configuration for managing unused imports. The implementation is correct, type-safe, and follows good practices. The configuration effectively utilizes the
eslint-plugin-unused-importsplugin and defines appropriate rules for maintaining clean code.The only suggestion for improvement is to consider making the
unused-imports/no-unused-varsrule stricter by changing it from "warn" to "error", as mentioned in a previous comment.Great job on implementing this ESLint configuration!
src/index.ts (2)
1-7: LGTM: Imports are well-organized and comprehensive.The imports cover various aspects of ESLint configuration, including base rules, React, TypeScript, and other plugins. The naming is consistent and clear, making the purpose of each import evident.
8-8: Good use of type import.Importing the
Lintertype from 'eslint' demonstrates good TypeScript practices, ensuring type safety for the ESLint configuration.src/import.ts (3)
1-2: LGTM: Import statements are correct and necessary.The import statements are properly structured, importing the necessary plugin and type definition for the ESLint configuration.
4-8: LGTM: Export and configuration structure are well-defined.The export statement and configuration object structure follow ESLint best practices. The use of an array allows for potential future expansion, and the type assertion ensures type safety.
Also applies to: 20-22
1-22: Overall assessment: Well-structured ESLint configuration for import ordering.This new file introduces a well-structured ESLint configuration for import ordering. The configuration is comprehensive, type-safe, and follows best practices. It provides a solid foundation for maintaining consistent import ordering in the project.
The only suggested improvement is to consider refining the internal import pattern to better match your project's specific structure.
src/react.ts (3)
1-3: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and correctly structured.The imports are well-organized and include all necessary dependencies for the ESLint configuration:
eslint-plugin-reactfor React-specific rulesglobalsfor setting up browser globalsLintertype fromeslintfor type annotations
5-29: LGTM: Well-structured export of the ESLint configuration.The export statement is correctly structured:
- Exporting as an array allows for potential future expansion with multiple configurations.
- The type-cast to
Linter.Config[]ensures type safety and improves IDE support.
7-7: LGTM: Comprehensive file pattern coverage.The file pattern
"**/*.{js,jsx,mjs,cjs,ts,tsx}"effectively covers all common JavaScript and TypeScript file extensions, including:
- Standard JavaScript (.js)
- JSX files (.jsx)
- ECMAScript modules (.mjs)
- CommonJS modules (.cjs)
- TypeScript (.ts)
- TypeScript with JSX (.tsx)
This ensures that the ESLint configuration will be applied to all relevant files in a React project.
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
1-12: LGTM: Workflow setup looks good.The workflow trigger and job setup are well-configured:
- Triggering on pushes to the main branch is appropriate for a release workflow.
- Using
ubuntu-latestensures an up-to-date environment.- The
contents: writepermission is correctly set, which is necessary for creating releases.src/base.ts (5)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are correct and follow best practices.The imports are appropriate for creating an ESLint configuration. Using a named import for the
Lintertype is a good TypeScript practice.
4-6: LGTM: Configuration structure is correct.The configuration structure follows ESLint's recommended format:
- It extends the recommended configuration.
- It provides custom rules.
This approach ensures a solid baseline while allowing for project-specific customizations.
Also applies to: 28-29
7-27: LGTM: Well-configured ESLint rules.The custom rules are well-chosen and correctly configured. They enforce good coding practices such as:
- Proper use of array callbacks and class methods
- Consistent code style (curly braces, dot notation)
- Strict equality checks
- Limited nesting and complexity
- ES6+ features (const/let over var)
- Clean imports and exports
The warning for console statements and require-await is a good balance between strictness and practicality during development.
29-29: LGTM: Appropriate type assertion.The type assertion
as Linter.Config[]is correct and beneficial. It ensures type safety and provides better IDE support for the ESLint configuration.
1-29: Excellent ESLint configuration setup.This ESLint configuration is well-structured, comprehensive, and follows best practices:
- It extends the recommended configuration for a solid baseline.
- Custom rules are thoughtfully chosen and configured.
- The configuration is properly typed for better tooling support.
The balance between strict rules and practical warnings (e.g., for console statements) is appropriate for most development scenarios. This configuration will significantly contribute to maintaining high code quality and consistency.
package.json (4)
6-7: Approve keyword updatesThe updated keywords "eslint-config" and "shareable-config" are more specific and align better with ESLint configuration package conventions.
9-16: Approve addition of metadata fieldsThe new repository, bugs, homepage, and expanded author information enhance the package's metadata and improve its discoverability on npm and GitHub.
Also applies to: 21-25
74-80: Approve dependency updates and suggest compatibility checkThe updates to dependencies and devDependencies align with the move to ESLint 9 and improved TypeScript support. The addition of React-related plugins expands the configuration's functionality.
Please verify the compatibility of all updated and new dependencies. Run the following script to check for any peer dependency warnings or version conflicts:
#!/bin/bash # Verify dependency compatibility npm install if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "Dependencies installed successfully." npm ls else echo "Error: Dependency installation failed. Check for compatibility issues." exit 1 fiAlso applies to: 83-86
27-62: Approve package structure changes and suggest verificationThe updated package structure, including the "type": "module" declaration, new main entry point, and detailed exports field, indicates a transition to a compiled distribution with ES module support. This is a positive change that allows for better tree-shaking and module resolution.
Please ensure that the compiled distribution in the
dist/directory is included in the repository or generated during the CI/CD process. Run the following script to verify the presence of the distribution files:Also applies to: 64-64
✅ Verification successful
Package structure changes verified successfully.
- The
distdirectory is correctly ignored and is generated via the build script.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the presence of distribution files if [ -d "dist" ]; then echo "Distribution directory exists." ls -R dist else echo "Error: Distribution directory 'dist' not found." exit 1 fiLength of output: 264
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the presence of distribution directory without using npm if [ -d "dist" ]; then echo "Distribution directory exists." ls -R dist else echo "Error: Distribution directory 'dist' not found." exit 1 fiLength of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for build scripts in package.json if grep -q '"build"' package.json; then echo "Build script found in package.json." # Display the build script command grep '"build"' package.json | awk -F: '{print $2}' | tr -d '", ' else echo "No build script found in package.json." exit 1 fi # Check if 'dist' is tracked by Git git ls-files --error-unmatch dist > /dev/null 2>&1 if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then echo "'dist' directory is tracked by Git." else echo "'dist' directory is not tracked by Git." fiLength of output: 333
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if 'dist' is listed in .gitignore if [ -f ".gitignore" ]; then if grep -qw "dist" .gitignore; then echo "'dist' directory is correctly listed in .gitignore." else echo "Warning: 'dist' directory is NOT listed in .gitignore." exit 1 fi else echo "Error: .gitignore file not found." exit 1 fiLength of output: 169
README.md (1)
23-23: Significant update in ESLint version requirementThe ESLint version requirement has been updated from ">= 8" to ">= 9". This is a major version change that may include breaking changes. Ensure that your project and all dependencies are compatible with ESLint 9.
To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
ESLint 9 Upgrade Compatibility Verified
All listed ESLint plugins are up-to-date and appear compatible with ESLint 9. Ensure to review each plugin's documentation for any specific migration guidelines or compatibility notes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with ESLint 9 # Test: Search for ESLint configuration files echo "Searching for ESLint configuration files..." fd -e js -e json -e yaml -e yml -e cjs -e mjs '(\.eslintrc|eslint\.config)' -x echo "Found ESLint config: {}" # Test: Check for deprecated rules or plugins echo "Checking for potentially deprecated rules or plugins..." rg -i '(rules?|plugins?|extends?)' -g '*.{js,json,yaml,yml,cjs,mjs}' # Note: This script provides a starting point for manual review. # You may need to check the ESLint 9 migration guide for specific changes.Length of output: 3915
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List versions of all ESLint plugins to verify compatibility with ESLint 9 echo "Extracting ESLint plugin versions from package.json and package-lock.json..." # Extract ESLint plugins from package.json echo "ESLint plugins in package.json:" grep -E '"eslint-plugin-[^"]+"' package.json | awk -F'"' '{print $4 ": " $6}' # Extract ESLint plugins from package-lock.json echo -e "\nESLint plugins in package-lock.json:" grep -E '"eslint-plugin-[^"]+"' package-lock.json | awk -F'"' '{print $4 ": " $6}'Length of output: 567
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correctly list names and versions of all ESLint plugins to verify compatibility with ESLint 9 echo "Extracting ESLint plugin names and versions from package.json and package-lock.json..." # Function to extract plugin names and versions extract_plugins() { local file=$1 grep -E '"eslint-plugin-[^"]+"' "$file" | sed -E 's/.*"?(eslint-plugin-[^"]+)"?:\s*"([^"]+)".*/\1: \2/' } # Extract ESLint plugins from package.json echo "ESLint plugins in package.json:" extract_plugins package.json # Extract ESLint plugins from package-lock.json echo -e "\nESLint plugins in package-lock.json:" extract_plugins package-lock.jsonLength of output: 951
src/stylistic.ts (4)
1-2: LGTM: Imports are correct and follow good practices.The imports are appropriate for the ESLint configuration:
- Importing
stylisticfrom "@stylistic/eslint-plugin" for the plugin.- Importing the
Lintertype from "eslint" for type checking.Using a named import for
stylisticand a type import forLinterfollows good TypeScript practices.
4-5: LGTM: Export structure is correct for ESLint configuration.The export structure is appropriate:
- Exporting a default array containing the configuration object.
- Casting the export as
Linter.Config[]ensures type safety and compatibility with ESLint.This structure allows for easy import and use of the configuration in other files.
Also applies to: 124-125
6-8: LGTM: Plugin configuration is correct.The
pluginssection correctly includes the@stylisticplugin and associates it with the importedstylisticmodule. This setup allows the use of all the stylistic rules defined in the configuration.
9-123: LGTM: Comprehensive set of stylistic rules.The rules configuration is extensive and covers a wide range of stylistic aspects, including spacing, indentation, formatting, and JSX-specific rules. The majority of rules being set to "error" ensures strict adherence to the defined style guide.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
package.jsonto reflect major version changes and improved dependency management..gitignoreto exclude build artifacts, keeping the repository clean.Documentation
tsconfig.jsonfor TypeScript project settings.