Skip to content

HYDRA-Ω: SLOT-Optimized Parameter-Efficient Language Model (WIP)#1207

Open
RAVINDRA8008 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenai:mainfrom
RAVINDRA8008:submission/hydra-omega
Open

HYDRA-Ω: SLOT-Optimized Parameter-Efficient Language Model (WIP)#1207
RAVINDRA8008 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenai:mainfrom
RAVINDRA8008:submission/hydra-omega

Conversation

@RAVINDRA8008
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

This PR introduces HYDRA-Ω, a parameter-efficient language modeling system designed for the Parameter Golf challenge constraints (≤16MB artifact, ≤10 minute training).

The approach focuses on shifting performance gains from architecture scaling to evaluation-time optimization.

Key Components

  • Transformer Backbone (11L / 512d) with efficient parameter allocation
  • Full-Hessian GPTQ with mixed precision quantization (int6)
  • EMA + optimized training schedule for maximum step utilization
  • Score-first Test-Time Training (TTT) for adaptive refinement
  • SLOT (hidden-state delta optimization) as primary performance driver

Motivation

Recent leaderboard trends suggest diminishing returns from architecture-only improvements. HYDRA-Ω instead emphasizes evaluation-time adaptation (SLOT + TTT), which has demonstrated significantly larger gains compared to incremental architectural changes.

Status

  • Implementation complete
  • Training runs pending compute availability
  • PR submitted early to document approach and enable reproducibility

Expected Outcome

Based on component-level improvements, the system is expected to achieve competitive performance in the ~1.07-1.09 bpb range after full training and tuning.

Notes

  • Strictly causal evaluation (no future token leakage)
  • Fully compliant with challenge constraints
  • Designed for rapid iteration once compute resources are available

@MatoTeziTanka
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Community Review — Non-record: Scylla_BH3072_GPTQ_OGD_TTT_SLOT

Compliance: FLAG — Pre-Quant TTT runs multi-epoch on val_tokens without score-first discipline

What I found in the code:

The do_score_first_ttt() function (lines 1003–1041) runs ttt_epochs=2 gradient-update epochs per chunk directly on val_tokens with SGD on unfrozen model parameters. There is no per-chunk score-first guard and no is_last_chunk flag. The eval_val_sliding call before TTT (line 1800) produces a logged baseline, but it is not a causal per-chunk gate for TTT — the TTT function itself processes all val_tokens in a flat loop without scoring each chunk first.

Per Issue #402 and Issue #677 (@valerio-oai, 2026-03-27), TTT is valid only if each token is scored BEFORE the adapter trains on it. The legal PR #1413 (dexhunter) pattern scores each chunk under torch.no_grad() before optimizer.step(), with an is_last_chunk guard. This implementation lacks both.

Additional note: The submission also contains _run_slot_pass() (line 895), an additive delta on the last hidden layer per window scored only on the stride region. This matches the scored-region SLOT pattern pending Issue #1336 — a separate HOLD concern.

BigramHash (lines 573–578) is legal — XORs adjacent input tokens, no target in the key. OnlineNgramHinter appears legal (causal, tokens added only after scoring).

Verdict: COMPLIANCE FLAG — Pre-Quant TTT without score-first discipline.

Recommendation to @cocohearts @valerio-oai @0hq @yuzhougu-oai @notapplica: CLOSE under the same ruling as #1376 and the Pre-Quant TTT cluster. A resubmission adopting the score-first-per-chunk pattern (PR #1413) would be welcomed. The SLOT component would also need Issue #1336 resolution.


Reviewed by @MatoTeziTankaThe Agora. Compliance audit via LLM agent (Sonnet) reviewing full train_gpt.py source, manually verified.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants