HYDRA-Ω: SLOT-Optimized Parameter-Efficient Language Model (WIP)#1207
HYDRA-Ω: SLOT-Optimized Parameter-Efficient Language Model (WIP)#1207RAVINDRA8008 wants to merge 1 commit intoopenai:mainfrom
Conversation
Community Review — Non-record: Scylla_BH3072_GPTQ_OGD_TTT_SLOTCompliance: FLAG — Pre-Quant TTT runs multi-epoch on What I found in the code: The Per Issue #402 and Issue #677 (@valerio-oai, 2026-03-27), TTT is valid only if each token is scored BEFORE the adapter trains on it. The legal PR #1413 (dexhunter) pattern scores each chunk under Additional note: The submission also contains BigramHash (lines 573–578) is legal — XORs adjacent input tokens, no target in the key. OnlineNgramHinter appears legal (causal, tokens added only after scoring). Verdict: COMPLIANCE FLAG — Pre-Quant TTT without score-first discipline. Recommendation to @cocohearts @valerio-oai @0hq @yuzhougu-oai @notapplica: CLOSE under the same ruling as #1376 and the Pre-Quant TTT cluster. A resubmission adopting the score-first-per-chunk pattern (PR #1413) would be welcomed. The SLOT component would also need Issue #1336 resolution. Reviewed by @MatoTeziTanka — The Agora. Compliance audit via LLM agent (Sonnet) reviewing full train_gpt.py source, manually verified. |
Summary
This PR introduces HYDRA-Ω, a parameter-efficient language modeling system designed for the Parameter Golf challenge constraints (≤16MB artifact, ≤10 minute training).
The approach focuses on shifting performance gains from architecture scaling to evaluation-time optimization.
Key Components
Motivation
Recent leaderboard trends suggest diminishing returns from architecture-only improvements. HYDRA-Ω instead emphasizes evaluation-time adaptation (SLOT + TTT), which has demonstrated significantly larger gains compared to incremental architectural changes.
Status
Expected Outcome
Based on component-level improvements, the system is expected to achieve competitive performance in the ~1.07-1.09 bpb range after full training and tuning.
Notes