Skip to content

Conversation

@liach
Copy link
Member

@liach liach commented Jun 24, 2025

Currently, fake parameters are created with "arg0" etc. strings that are retained for class file methods with no MethodParameters attribute. The original issue report observes many of these strings present in the heap. To address this issue, we can remove these eagerly created fake names, bringing their behavior in line with nameless parameters from MethodParameters attribute, such as those from inner class constructors. A unit test verifies that no name is retained in the Parameter object when the name is fake.

The original report recommends using a pool to store the arg name strings. I did not take that approach as I don't think it is very necessary; if the issue of retained fake names persist, we can update Parameter::getName to return fake names from a pool instead.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8362626 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8357728: Avoid caching synthesized names in synthesized parameters (Enhancement - P4)(⚠️ The fixVersion in this issue is [27] but the fixVersion in .jcheck/conf is 26, a new backport will be created when this pr is integrated.)
  • JDK-8362626: Avoid caching synthesized names in synthesized parameters (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25961/head:pull/25961
$ git checkout pull/25961

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25961
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25961/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25961

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25961

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25961.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 24, 2025

👋 Welcome back liach! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2025

@liach This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8357728: Avoid caching synthesized names in synthesized parameters

Reviewed-by: jvernee

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 60 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 24, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 24, 2025

@liach The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Webrevs

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member

jddarcy commented Jul 18, 2025

/csr needed

@jddarcy
Copy link
Member

jddarcy commented Jul 18, 2025

@liach , please file a CSR for the behavioral change here.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jul 18, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2025

@jddarcy has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.

@liach please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8357728 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Jul 18, 2025

Done. I have described the context in detail and moved the CSR to proposed.

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 16, 2025

@liach This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 13, 2025

@liach This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Sep 13, 2025
@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Nov 14, 2025

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Nov 14, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2025

@liach This pull request is now open

@liach liach changed the title 8357728: Optimize Executable#synthesizeAllParams 8357728 Nov 14, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8357728 8357728: Avoid caching synthesized names in synthesized parameters Nov 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@JornVernee JornVernee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Nov 19, 2025
@liach
Copy link
Member Author

liach commented Nov 19, 2025

Thanks for the reviews!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Going to push as commit f0afd89.
Since your change was applied there have been 66 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 19, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 19, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 19, 2025

@liach Pushed as commit f0afd89.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants