Skip to content

Conversation

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor

@AlanBateman AlanBateman commented Nov 23, 2025

DelayScheduler.replace missing check to sift up when replaced with smaller value. checkHeap checks invariants when replacing. Executing tests with make run-test or other targets runs tests with -esa so assume is enabled.

New regression test to ensure delayed tests executes in expected delay order.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8370887: DelayScheduler.replace method may break the 4-ary heap in certain scenarios (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Contributors

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28469/head:pull/28469
$ git checkout pull/28469

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28469
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28469/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28469

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28469

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28469.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/contributor add dl

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back alanb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 23, 2025

@AlanBateman This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8370887: DelayScheduler.replace method may break the 4-ary heap in certain scenarios

Co-authored-by: Doug Lea <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: vklang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 23, 2025

@AlanBateman
Contributor Doug Lea <[email protected]> successfully added.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 23, 2025

@AlanBateman The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@AlanBateman AlanBateman marked this pull request as ready for review November 24, 2025 14:17
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 24, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@viktorklang-ora viktorklang-ora left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work @AlanBateman & @DougLea 👍

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Nov 24, 2025
@AlanBateman
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2025

Going to push as commit cc5b35b.
Since your change was applied there have been 21 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 25, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 25, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 25, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 25, 2025

@AlanBateman Pushed as commit cc5b35b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants