Skip to content

Conversation

Arraying
Copy link
Member

@Arraying Arraying commented Oct 7, 2025

Hi all,

This PR follows up on changes made in JDK-8368875. I updated the documentation to reflect the new information gained.

Furthermore, the investigation described in the issue yielded that we must preserve the larval bit explicitly. I introduce a regression test. If we change the mark word preservation condition to return (!is_unlocked() || !has_no_hash()) (i.e. what we had before), I have confirmed that we will crash a debug VM via failed assertion. Note that ZGC does not require mark word preservation. I've nonetheless decided to include it in case this behaviour is introduced later.

Testing: tiers 1-3.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace

Issue

  • JDK-8369134: [lworld] We should preserve the markWord for all GCs (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1666/head:pull/1666
$ git checkout pull/1666

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1666
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1666/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1666

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1666

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1666.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 7, 2025

👋 Welcome back phubner! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into lworld will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 7, 2025

@Arraying This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8369134: [lworld] We should preserve the markWord for all GCs

Reviewed-by: coleenp

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 219 new commits pushed to the lworld branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@coleenp) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8369134 8369134: [lworld] Should we preserve the markWord for all GCs Oct 7, 2025
@Arraying Arraying changed the title 8369134: [lworld] Should we preserve the markWord for all GCs 8369134 Oct 16, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title 8369134 8369134: [lworld] We should preserve the markWord for all GCs Oct 16, 2025
@Arraying Arraying marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2025 15:49
@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 17, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment looks good.

}
}

private static void stressTheGC() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a WhiteBox FullGC that you can call that might be a reliable way of calling System.gc().

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for letting me know, I've pushed an update.

Copy link
Contributor

@coleenp coleenp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@Arraying
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review @coleenp.
/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Oct 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@Arraying
Your change (at version a75ca11) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@MrSimms
Copy link
Member

MrSimms commented Oct 21, 2025

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Going to push as commit b5e30d5.
Since your change was applied there have been 219 commits pushed to the lworld branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 21, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Oct 21, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@MrSimms @Arraying Pushed as commit b5e30d5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants