-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
8369134: [lworld] We should preserve the markWord for all GCs #1666
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back phubner! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@Arraying This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 219 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@coleenp) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment looks good.
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private static void stressTheGC() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's a WhiteBox FullGC that you can call that might be a reliable way of calling System.gc().
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for letting me know, I've pushed an update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good!
|
Thanks for the review @coleenp. |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit b5e30d5.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Hi all,
This PR follows up on changes made in JDK-8368875. I updated the documentation to reflect the new information gained.
Furthermore, the investigation described in the issue yielded that we must preserve the larval bit explicitly. I introduce a regression test. If we change the mark word preservation condition to
return (!is_unlocked() || !has_no_hash())(i.e. what we had before), I have confirmed that we will crash a debug VM via failed assertion. Note that ZGC does not require mark word preservation. I've nonetheless decided to include it in case this behaviour is introduced later.Testing: tiers 1-3.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1666/head:pull/1666$ git checkout pull/1666Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1666$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla.git pull/1666/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1666View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1666Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/1666.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment