Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

defaults are set to dataframe as part of first step towards issue #1115 #1390

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SubhadityaMukherjee
Copy link

Reference Issue

First step towards issue #1115 as mentioned in the discussion.

What does this PR implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Here, only the defaults have been changed from either dict or array to dataframe.

How should this PR be tested?

Since only the defaults were changed. Might not need changes to tests. Although that remains to be seen.

Any other comments?

There are some issues with minio imports that might cause the test to fail. (Not part of changes done here)

@SubhadityaMukherjee SubhadityaMukherjee linked an issue Feb 6, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@SubhadityaMukherjee
Copy link
Author

Contrary to what the default github message says, this will not close the issue. This is step 1 out of 2 in removing the dict/array and only keeping dataframe.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (develop@0ec2f85). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #1390   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   69.52%           
==========================================
  Files              ?       38           
  Lines              ?     5325           
  Branches           ?        0           
==========================================
  Hits               ?     3702           
  Misses             ?     1623           
  Partials           ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@PGijsbers
Copy link
Collaborator

Oops.. looks like #1372 forgot to mention #1115. Looking at the work done so far, we should build on #1372 instead. I don't believe @eddiebergman is currently planning contributions to OpenML as he is moving to a new job.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Default output_format to "dataframe"
3 participants