Skip to content

[release-4.18] OCPBUGS-50983: Store Topology sidebar alert in the localStorage #14774

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14700

/assign vikram-raj

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-45141 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50983. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-50983: Store Topology sidebar alert in the localStorage

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14700

/assign vikram-raj

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-45141: Store Topology sidebar alert in the localStorage [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-50983: Store Topology sidebar alert in the localStorage Feb 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 18, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50983, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14700

/assign vikram-raj

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 18, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added component/shared Related to console-shared component/topology Related to topology labels Feb 18, 2025
@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@vikram-raj: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50983, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

/retest

Copy link
Member

@vikram-raj vikram-raj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Feb 27, 2025
@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 27, 2025
@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

2 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

6 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b033fc1 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b122a02 and 1 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b122a02 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b122a02 and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

4 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

2 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4294cdd and 2 for PR HEAD c5ef056 in total

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 6, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-console c5ef056 link true /test e2e-gcp-console

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@vikram-raj
Copy link
Member

Closing this in favour of #15023

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this May 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 6, 2025

@vikram-raj: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Closing this in favour of #15023

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-50983. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #14700

/assign vikram-raj

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. component/shared Related to console-shared component/topology Related to topology jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.