-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 637
OCPBUGS-56087: Opening Edit Secret modal and saving without changes throws error #15058
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
OCPBUGS-56087: Opening Edit Secret modal and saving without changes throws error #15058
Conversation
@Mylanos: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56087, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Mylanos The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/jira refresh |
@Mylanos: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56087, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
@Mylanos: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56087, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
}), | ||
acc[key] = value ? Base64.decode(value) : ''; | ||
return acc; | ||
}, {} as { [key: string]: string }), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit - you can avoid accumulator type as
cast like so
Object.entries<Record<string, string>>( ... )
previously when you tried to edit a Secret with binary data, the string data was initialized with a keypair with null value instead of an empty object, which resulted in errors when saving the secret without changes. After those changes we omit keypairs that have binary values.
3e2a80d
to
154c422
Compare
@Mylanos: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
restructure initialization of
stringData
previously when you tried to edit a Secret with binary data, the
stringData
was initialized to be a key pair with null value instead of being an empty object, which resulted in errors when saving the secret without changes. After those changes we omit key pairs that have binary values from thestringData
.after:
Screen.Recording.2025-05-16.at.16.29.29.mov