Add NoRegistryClusterInstall capability to variant registry#3772
Conversation
|
Pipeline controller notification For optional jobs, comment This repository is configured in: automatic mode |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited) Review profile: CHILL Plan: Enterprise Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
WalkthroughAdds classification for ChangesNo-registry installer classification
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 21✅ Passed checks (21 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
|
@dgoodwin , @JoelSpeed Proposing this PR to fix that. /cc @andfasano |
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
/lgtm |
|
Did this just happen due to #3731 merging? I may have moved too fast there. My change removes the "install should succeed" hack, but it also now requires a full job pass, all tests. That is a major change for the installer. This is consistent with where I want this to go, I'd like jobs like this to map capability as you've done in your PR, but run a reduced and less sensitive set of tests (the main conformance suite is planned to be scaled down to this). These jobs full pass less than 30% of the time, you'll never make it through promotion. Working on what to do now, I think I need to revert my change for the time being. However these jobs can and should map their capability. |
| {[]string{"-cpu-partitioning"}, "Node / Kubelet", "CPU Partitioning", "spotcheck-30d"}, | ||
| {[]string{"-etcd-scaling"}, "Etcd", "Scaling", "spotcheck-30d"}, | ||
| {[]string{"-aws-ovn-installer-dualstack"}, "Installer", "AWSDualStackInstall", "candidate"}, | ||
| {[]string{"-iso-no-registry"}, "Installer", "NoRegistryClusterInstall", "candidate"}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The component should match a jira component, which I believe is "Installer / openshift-installer"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The exact component type - that we also used to expose it in CR - it's Installer / Agent based installation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we have a substring match?
|
/hold |
Yes, that is a problem. The current problem I am trying to fix is regarding the discoverability of jobs with this featuregate. As part of openshift/api#2859, |
This change adds Component and Capability tracking for Agent IRI No registry nstaller jobs in the variant registry system. Jobs matching the pattern '-iso-no-registry` are now classified with: - Component: Installer - Capability: NoRegistryClusterInstall - JobTier: candidate This enables Sippy to track these jobs separately via the capability-based variant system introduced in PR openshift#3696.
48528d7 to
984250c
Compare
|
Scheduling required tests: |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin, JoelSpeed, sadasu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@sadasu: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This change adds Component and Capability tracking for Agent IRI No registry nstaller jobs in the variant registry system.
Jobs matching the pattern '-iso-no-registry` are now classified with:
This enables Sippy to track these jobs separately via the capability-based variant system introduced in PR #3696.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
NoRegistryClusterInstallcapability alongside the installer/agent component.Tests