Skip to content

Conversation

@Lewiscowles1986
Copy link

Description

Adds some blurb to the main installation page, as it is the default navigated page from the docs if I click installation.

Motivation and Context

I Cannot be the only person that thought "why is there a blank installation page". The other pages are really good too!

I'm totally cool if this cannot be merged, but I was really expecting cargo install or install binaries to be on this page, so it caused a momentary disconnect that I had to look for where to find the information, instead of it being right there for me.

A list of links might be nice, but; for-now, this would at least allow continuous flow.

How Has This Been Tested?

I just wrote text in a docs page.

Screenshots / Logs (if applicable)

Just what the page looks like for me when I visited.

Original installation page

Types of Changes

  • Documentation (no code change)

Checklist:

  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

I Cannot be the only person that thought "why is there a blank installation page". The other pages are really good too!
@Lewiscowles1986 Lewiscowles1986 requested a review from orhun as a code owner July 27, 2025 15:39
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Jul 27, 2025

Thanks for opening this pull request! Please check out our contributing guidelines! ⛰️

@Lewiscowles1986
Copy link
Author

While I could change https://github.com/orhun/git-cliff/actions/runs/16552784738/job/46810035103; I don't think it really belongs in this patch set.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 41.59%. Comparing base (8b5a547) to head (020096f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1226   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.59%   41.59%           
=======================================
  Files          22       22           
  Lines        1919     1919           
=======================================
  Hits          798      798           
  Misses       1121     1121           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit-tests 41.59% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants