We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The current system of specifying L4/L5 indices for ranges in the x86 address space is a bit flawed.
For example, let's take the userspace module load segments:
17 << (12 + 9 * 3) = 0x88000000000
17 << (12 + 9 * 4) = 0x11000000000000
This obviously breaks a lot of assumptions, especially when linking modules, and needs to be addressed somehow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
The current system of specifying L4/L5 indices for ranges in the x86 address space is a bit flawed.
For example, let's take the userspace module load segments:
17 << (12 + 9 * 3) = 0x88000000000
17 << (12 + 9 * 4) = 0x11000000000000
This obviously breaks a lot of assumptions, especially when linking modules, and needs to be addressed somehow.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: