Skip to content

ext/posix: posix_kill() process_id range check. #18944

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

devnexen
Copy link
Member

pid_t is, for the most part, represented by a signed int, by overflowing it, we end up being in the -1 case which affect all accessible processes.

@devnexen
Copy link
Member Author

before going into a pid_t handling "killing spree" all over the extension, let me know if this is something wishable.

@devnexen devnexen force-pushed the posix_oflow_nonposix branch from 996cc69 to e9402c6 Compare June 25, 2025 22:04
@devnexen
Copy link
Member Author

cc @Girgias

@Girgias
Copy link
Member

Girgias commented Jul 12, 2025

I think this makes sense, as anything outside of this range seems to point to a bug

@devnexen devnexen force-pushed the posix_oflow_nonposix branch from e9402c6 to a84a097 Compare July 12, 2025 16:29
pid_t is, for the most part, represented by a signed int, by overflowing
it, we end up being in the -1 case which affect all accessible processes.
@devnexen devnexen force-pushed the posix_oflow_nonposix branch from a84a097 to c540a26 Compare July 12, 2025 17:03
@devnexen devnexen marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2025 17:16
@bukka
Copy link
Member

bukka commented Jul 15, 2025

What actually happens on -2 at the moment?

@devnexen
Copy link
Member Author

hmmm looking at it now, negative numbers < -1 might be relevant cases, they normally aim for process groups in this case e.g. -2 -> process group 2 but will have a look later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants