-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 701
br: make version compatible table more clear #21154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @RidRisR, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request updates the documentation for Backup & Restore (BR) to include the latest version (v8.5.0) in the compatibility matrices and improves the clarity and consistency of the version formatting within those tables.
Highlights
- Documentation Update: Added compatibility information for v8.5.0 to the Backup & Restore (BR) version compatibility tables.
- Formatting Consistency: Standardized the version format in the BR compatibility tables, specifically changing '7.1.0' to 'v7.1.0' for consistency.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This PR updates the BR compatibility tables to include v8.5.0
. The suggestions focus on ensuring the "Compatible restore versions" entry for v8.5.0
is as clear and consistent as possible with existing patterns, particularly if forward compatibility to later patch/minor/major versions is supported. This aligns with the style guide's emphasis on clarity[^1] and consistency[^2].
Style Guide Summary:
The review references the following style guide principles:
- Clarity and Simplicity (Line 21): Ensuring documentation is easy for users to understand. This was applied when suggesting a potentially clearer phrasing for version compatibility (e.g., "v8.5.0 and later" if applicable).[^1]
- Consistent Terminology (Line 25): Maintaining consistency in how version compatibility is expressed across different entries in the table. This was relevant to the suggestion about the "vX.Y.Z and later" pattern.[^2]
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
@Leavrth: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. In response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: qiancai The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created to branch |
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?