Skip to content

Conversation

@pull
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Feb 5, 2026

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.4)

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

AaronMT and others added 9 commits February 5, 2026 13:52
…dy to run free" to the existing "Welcome to Firefox" string. r=android-reviewers,android-l10n-reviewers,flod,marcin

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D281751
…UI test r=aaronmt

The UI test was disabled when the TranslationOptionsDialog has been updated to use the M3 switch component SwitchListItem in [[ https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D278981 | D278981 ]]

Removed the assertions that checked that the options are enabled (after the change, their state is always enabled), and only left the assertions in which we check if the options are checked.

The UI test successfully passed 50x on Firebase ✅

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D281953
…nsole.timeStamp r=dcarver

Before we switched to the Firefox Profiler in the DevTools, we had
timeline markers for these console methods. But apparently, since we did
the switch, we never added markers for them.

From our conversations with Chrome folks, they mentioned that some JS
frameworks started using these instead of performance.mark/measure
combinations especially the console.timeStamp one since it's just an
instant marker, stating that they are higher overhead. Even though I
don't completely understand their rationale, I think it makes sense to
add markers for these methods. It essentially adds 2 different subtypes
that uses the same ConsoleTimingMarker.

1. console.time and console.timeEnd when combined create a duration
   marker with a label, similar to performance.mark and measure.
2. console.timeStamp creates an instant marker with a label.

One edge case is that, console.timeEnd doesn't create any markers when
it doesn't have a console.time with the same title, and vice versa.

Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D281521
@pull pull bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 5, 2026
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Feb 5, 2026
@pull pull bot merged commit 997d559 into pixeldevel:main Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants