Add github issues and PR tool #257
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@dhirenmathur has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe changes integrate a new GitHub tool across multiple agent classes and services. Each agent now conditionally initializes a GitHub tool instance if the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Agent
participant Env
participant GitHubTool
Agent->>Env: Check for GITHUB_APP_ID
alt GITHUB_APP_ID exists
Agent->>GitHubTool: Initialize github_tool
Agent-->>Agent: Add github_tool to tools list
else
Agent-->>Agent: Skip github_tool initialization
end
Agent->>GitHubTool: Invoke tool functionality (if available)
sequenceDiagram
participant BlastRadiusAgent
participant CodeFetcher
participant GitHubTool
BlastRadiusAgent->>CodeFetcher: Retrieve code from multiple node IDs
Note right of BlastRadiusAgent: (Uses GetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsTool)
alt GITHUB_APP_ID exists
BlastRadiusAgent->>GitHubTool: Utilize GitHub-related analysis
end
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/unit_test_agent.py (1)
48-50: Consider refactoring for better readability.The list concatenation split across multiple lines could be simplified for better readability.
Consider this more concise approach:
- self.get_code_from_probable_node_name, - ] + ([self.webpage_extractor_tool] if hasattr(self, 'webpage_extractor_tool') else []) - + ([self.github_tool] if hasattr(self, 'github_tool') else []), + self.get_code_from_probable_node_name + ] + [ + tool for tool in [self.webpage_extractor_tool, self.github_tool] + if hasattr(self, tool.__class__.__name__.lower()) + ],app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py (1)
72-95: Handle non-200 responses more gracefully.While an exception is raised when a non-200 status code occurs, consider providing clearer user feedback about the specific error encountered (e.g., a 404 for a non-existent repository or a 403 for insufficient permissions). Logging is good, but spearheading user guidance in the return message might improve the developer experience.
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/blast_radius_agent.py (1)
20-20: Remove unused importGetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsTool.You import the class
GetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsTool, but it is never directly referenced (you use only the function factoryget_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool). Removing the unused class import will eliminate the static analysis warning and keep the code tidy.- from app.modules.intelligence.tools.kg_based_tools.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool import ( - GetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsTool, get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool, ) + from app.modules.intelligence.tools.kg_based_tools.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool import ( + get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool, + )🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
20-20:
app.modules.intelligence.tools.kg_based_tools.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool.GetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsToolimported but unusedRemove unused import:
app.modules.intelligence.tools.kg_based_tools.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool.GetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsTool(F401)
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/integration_test_agent.py (2)
47-51: Consider using a more maintainable tools list construction pattern.The current list concatenation with multiple ternary operations could become harder to maintain as more tools are added.
Consider refactoring to a more readable pattern:
- tools = [ - self.get_code_from_probable_node_name, - self.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids, - ] + ([self.webpage_extractor_tool] if hasattr(self, 'webpage_extractor_tool') else []) \ - + ([self.github_tool] if hasattr(self, 'github_tool') else []) + tools = [ + self.get_code_from_probable_node_name, + self.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids, + ] + + # Add optional tools if available + optional_tools = { + 'webpage_extractor_tool': self.webpage_extractor_tool, + 'github_tool': self.github_tool + } + + tools.extend(tool for name, tool in optional_tools.items() + if hasattr(self, name))
41-42: Consider adding error handling for GitHub tool initialization.The GitHub tool initialization should handle potential configuration errors gracefully.
Consider adding error handling:
- if os.getenv("GITHUB_APP_ID"): - self.github_tool = github_tool(sql_db, user_id) + try: + if os.getenv("GITHUB_APP_ID"): + self.github_tool = github_tool(sql_db, user_id) + except Exception as e: + # Log the error but don't fail agent initialization + print(f"Failed to initialize GitHub tool: {e}")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/blast_radius_agent.py(2 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/code_gen_agent.py(3 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/debug_rag_agent.py(3 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/integration_test_agent.py(2 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/low_level_design_agent.py(3 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/rag_agent.py(3 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/unit_test_agent.py(2 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/tools/tool_service.py(2 hunks)app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py
5-5: typing.List imported but unused
Remove unused import: typing.List
(F401)
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/blast_radius_agent.py
20-20: app.modules.intelligence.tools.kg_based_tools.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool.GetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsTool imported but unused
Remove unused import: app.modules.intelligence.tools.kg_based_tools.get_code_from_multiple_node_ids_tool.GetCodeFromMultipleNodeIdsTool
(F401)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pre-commit
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py
[warning] 120-120: Code does not adhere to PEP 8 standards. Please format the code using Black.
🔇 Additional comments (15)
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/unit_test_agent.py (3)
21-21: LGTM!The import statement follows the established pattern and is correctly placed with other tool imports.
38-39: LGTM!The initialization follows the established pattern and correctly passes required parameters.
54-54: LGTM!The parameter rename improves consistency with the class attribute name.
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/low_level_design_agent.py (3)
36-36: LGTM!The import statement follows the established pattern and is correctly placed with other tool imports.
102-103: LGTM!The conditional tool inclusion is well-implemented using
hasattrand follows the established pattern.
86-87: Verify the environment variable configuration.The initialization looks good and follows the established pattern. However, let's verify that the
GITHUB_APP_IDenvironment variable is properly documented and configured.✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for documentation of GITHUB_APP_ID environment variable # Search for GITHUB_APP_ID in documentation files echo "Searching for GITHUB_APP_ID documentation..." rg -i "GITHUB_APP_ID" --type mdLength of output: 276
Environment Variable Configuration Verified
The documentation in
GETTING_STARTED.mdconfirms that theGITHUB_APP_IDenvironment variable is properly mentioned and used, and the conditional initialization in the code follows the established patterns.app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py (1)
50-52: Confirm thread usage.
asyncio.to_threadis being used to wrap the synchronousrunmethod. This approach is acceptable, but ensure there's no shared-state mutation that may require additional synchronization. Also, confirm that you actually need asynchronous behavior here, as wrapping a potentially long-running I/O-bound method with an async interface can introduce complexity.app/modules/intelligence/tools/tool_service.py (1)
48-49: Conditional initialization logic looks good.Conditionally creating
github_toolwhen credentials are available is a clean approach to optional tooling. The code appropriately checks forNonebefore adding it totools. This ensures minimal overhead and avoids runtime errors in environments that lack the GitHub app credentials.Also applies to: 74-78
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/blast_radius_agent.py (1)
41-45: Well-structured tool injection.Using environment variable checks for
FIRECRAWL_API_KEYandGITHUB_APP_IDneatly gates optional features. The logic cleanly ensures that tools are added only if they are valid. The updated agent role and goal accurately reflect the extended functionality, making the code more descriptive and cohesive.Also applies to: 47-58
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/rag_agent.py (2)
110-111: Same tools list construction pattern needs improvement.The same tools list construction pattern is used here. Please refer to the previous comment about making it more maintainable.
80-81: Same GitHub tool initialization needs error handling.The same GitHub tool initialization pattern is used here. Please refer to the previous comment about adding error handling.
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/debug_rag_agent.py (2)
110-111: Same tools list construction pattern needs improvement.The same tools list construction pattern is used here. Please refer to the previous comment about making it more maintainable.
79-80: Same GitHub tool initialization needs error handling.The same GitHub tool initialization pattern is used here. Please refer to the previous comment about adding error handling.
app/modules/intelligence/agents/agents/code_gen_agent.py (2)
90-91: Same tools list construction pattern needs improvement.The same tools list construction pattern is used here. Please refer to the previous comment about making it more maintainable.
58-59: Same GitHub tool initialization needs error handling.The same GitHub tool initialization pattern is used here. Please refer to the previous comment about adding error handling.
| allow_delegation=False, | ||
| verbose=True, | ||
| llm=self.llm, | ||
| max_iter=self.max_iter, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add max_iter parameter to design_planner agent for consistency.
The max_iter parameter is added to codebase_analyst but not to design_planner. For consistency, consider adding it to both agents.
Apply this diff to add max_iter to design_planner:
verbose=True,
llm=self.llm,
+ max_iter=self.max_iter,
)Also applies to: 126-127
| def _fetch_github_content(self, repo_name: str, issue_number: Optional[int], is_pull_request: bool) -> Optional[Dict[str, Any]]: | ||
| try: | ||
| github = self._get_github_client(repo_name) | ||
| repo = github.get_repo(repo_name) | ||
|
|
||
| if issue_number is None: | ||
| # Fetch all issues/PRs | ||
| if is_pull_request: | ||
| items = list(repo.get_pulls(state='all')[:10]) # Limit to 10 most recent | ||
| else: | ||
| items = list(repo.get_issues(state='all')[:10]) # Limit to 10 most recent | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| "success": True, | ||
| "content": [{ | ||
| "number": item.number, | ||
| "title": item.title, | ||
| "state": item.state, | ||
| "created_at": item.created_at.isoformat(), | ||
| "updated_at": item.updated_at.isoformat(), | ||
| "body": item.body, | ||
| "url": item.html_url, | ||
| } for item in items], | ||
| "metadata": { | ||
| "repo": repo_name, | ||
| "type": "pull_requests" if is_pull_request else "issues", | ||
| "count": len(items) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| else: | ||
| # Fetch specific issue/PR | ||
| if is_pull_request: | ||
| item = repo.get_pull(issue_number) | ||
| diff = item.get_files() | ||
| changes = [{ | ||
| "filename": file.filename, | ||
| "status": file.status, | ||
| "additions": file.additions, | ||
| "deletions": file.deletions, | ||
| "changes": file.changes, | ||
| "patch": file.patch if file.patch else None | ||
| } for file in diff] | ||
| else: | ||
| item = repo.get_issue(issue_number) | ||
| changes = None | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| "success": True, | ||
| "content": { | ||
| "number": item.number, | ||
| "title": item.title, | ||
| "state": item.state, | ||
| "created_at": item.created_at.isoformat(), | ||
| "updated_at": item.updated_at.isoformat(), | ||
| "body": item.body, | ||
| "url": item.html_url, | ||
| "changes": changes | ||
| }, | ||
| "metadata": { | ||
| "repo": repo_name, | ||
| "type": "pull_request" if is_pull_request else "issue", | ||
| "number": issue_number | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Validate issue/PR existence & ensure PEP 8 compliance.
- If the specified issue or pull request does not exist,
repo.get_pull()orrepo.get_issue()could raise exceptions. Consider catching these exceptions to provide more descriptive error messages. - A pipeline warning notes that code around line 120 may not adhere to PEP 8 formatting. Running a code formatter (e.g., Black) on this file will help ensure stylistic consistency.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pre-commit
[warning] 120-120: Code does not adhere to PEP 8 standards. Please format the code using Black.
| import asyncio | ||
| import logging | ||
| import requests | ||
| from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, List |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused typing.List.
Static analysis indicates that List is not used anywhere within this file. Removing it helps maintain code cleanliness and conform to linting standards.
- from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, List
+ from typing import Dict, Any, Optional📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from typing import Dict, Any, Optional, List | |
| from typing import Dict, Any, Optional |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
5-5: typing.List imported but unused
Remove unused import: typing.List
(F401)
|
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor