Handle public repos fallback in Github Tool #259
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce enhancements to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant GitTool as GithubTool
participant GitAPI as "Github API"
Caller->>GitTool: Initialize instance
alt Token list not populated
GitTool->>GitTool: initialize_tokens()
end
Caller->>GitTool: Request repository access
GitTool->>GitAPI: Attempt authenticated access with token
alt Authenticated access fails
GitTool->>GitTool: Log error
GitTool->>GitTool: get_public_github_instance() [get random token]
GitTool->>GitAPI: Attempt public access with new token
end
GitAPI-->>GitTool: Return repository data or error
GitTool-->>Caller: Return client or raise exception
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py (4)
50-60: Ensure robust handling of token availability.
Raising aValueErrorupon an empty token string is valid for fail-fast behavior. However, consider whether there's a fallback or a more graceful strategy if production workloads rely on partial functionality in the absence of tokens.
90-96: Random selection of tokens is acceptable but consider usage distribution.
Selecting tokens at random could cause uneven token usage under high load. Consider round-robin or tracking usage to balance rate limits across tokens.
120-120: Address PEP 8 code formatting.
The pipeline flagged a formatting issue here. Please run a code formatter (e.g., Black) to resolve styling noncompliance.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pre-commit
[warning] 120-120: Code does not adhere to PEP 8 standards. Please format the code using Black.
122-129: Chain the raised exception to the original error.
Per [B904], it’s recommended to useraise ... from public_errorto preserve the error context.Apply this diff for clarity:
- raise Exception(f"Repository {repo_name} not found or inaccessible on GitHub") + raise Exception(f"Repository {repo_name} not found or inaccessible on GitHub") from public_error🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
129-129: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py
129-129: Within an except clause, raise exceptions with raise ... from err or raise ... from None to distinguish them from errors in exception handling
(B904)
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py
101-103: Identified a Private Key, which may compromise cryptographic security and sensitive data encryption.
(private-key)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pre-commit
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py
[warning] 120-120: Code does not adhere to PEP 8 standards. Please format the code using Black.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
app/modules/intelligence/tools/web_tools/github_tool.py (4)
4-6: No immediate concerns; usage ofrandomandListlooks correct.
These imports are fine for the newly introduced functionality.
48-48: No changed code on this line.
65-66: Deferred token initialization is valid.
This lazy initialization ensures tokens are populated before first use.
238-238: No functional changes; finalize code formatting.
Re-runningblackor a similar formatter is recommended for consistent styling.
| "-----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\n" | ||
| + config_provider.get_github_key() | ||
| + "\n-----END RSA PRIVATE KEY-----\n" | ||
| ) | ||
| app_id = os.environ["GITHUB_APP_ID"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid embedding sensitive private key data within code.
Static analysis flagged a private key in these lines. Even though you partially construct it using config_provider, storing or reconstructing private keys in code can pose a security risk. Consider storing the entire key in a secure external location or environment variable to reduce the risk of accidental disclosure.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
101-103: Identified a Private Key, which may compromise cryptographic security and sensitive data encryption.
(private-key)
Summary by CodeRabbit