Skip to content

Conversation

animeshk923
Copy link

@animeshk923 animeshk923 commented Oct 10, 2025

Added a note so that the reader will have a clarity that their folder name may differ from the example presented in the document

Fixes #7114

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified that migration folder names vary per user and follow the format YYYYMMDDHHMMSS_your_text_from_name_flag.
    • Added this note in two locations within the Prisma Migrate getting started guide to reduce confusion when comparing outputs.
    • Improves clarity for new users by aligning instructions with actual tool-generated folder names.
    • No functional, configuration, or API changes—content-only update.

- added a note so that the reader will have a clarity that their folder name may differ from the example presented in the document
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds clarifying notes in the Prisma Migrate getting started guide indicating that migration folder names vary per user and follow the format YYYYMMDDHHMMSS_your_text_from_name_flag.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Docs: Prisma Migrate guide
content/200-orm/300-prisma-migrate/050-getting-started.mdx
Inserted notes in two places clarifying the per-user migration folder naming format (YYYYMMDDHHMMSS_your_text_from_name_flag). No logic or structural changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title “docs: add new note” is vague and does not convey the specific clarification about folder name timestamp variation; it merely notes that a note was added without describing its content or context. Please update the title to more clearly reflect the change, for example “docs(prisma-migrate): clarify folder name timestamp varies per user” to summarize the added note’s purpose.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@animeshk923
Copy link
Author

cc: @nurul3101 PTAL

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add a comment in code block for assurance and clarity

1 participant