[Plan 003] Remove order PII from the general authenticated surface - #12
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 49 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Implements Plan 003 and closes #7 when merged.
What changed
security_invokerorders_operationalview with only operational order fields.get_order_customer(uuid), a security-definer function that returns customer fields only to eventowner,ops, andfinance.Why
The previous authenticated order surface exposed buyer name, email, and phone to every role able to access an event. The database now enforces the operational/customer-data boundary independently of any future UI.
Checks
pnpm supabase:test: 32 assertions passed on local Supabasepnpm checksupabase db lint --local --fail-on error: no schema errorssupabase db advisors --local --type security --fail-on error: no issuesgit diff --checkStacking
This draft is based on PR #10 (
agent/001-verification-baseline) so its diff contains only Plan 003 changes relative to that PR. Do not merge it before the base PR.