Skip to content

[ctypes] Do we still need _use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_? #99284

Description

@sobolevn

While working on #99283 I've noticed this piece of code:

/* HACK Alert: I cannot be bothered to fix ctypes.com, so there has to
be a way to use the old, broken semantics: _fields_ are not extended
but replaced in subclasses.
XXX Remove this in ctypes 1.0!

if (_PyObject_LookupAttr(type,
&_Py_ID(_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_), &tmp) < 0)

I've never seen this before, so I went and searched for this on the internet: https://cs.github.com/?scopeName=All+repos&scope=&q=_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_

Looks like not a single GitHub project uses it.

Where is that used inside?

» ag _use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_
Tools/c-analyzer/cpython/globals-to-fix.tsv
761:Modules/_ctypes/stgdict.c   PyCStructUnionType_update_stgdict       PyId__use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_      -

Include/internal/pycore_global_strings.h
253:        STRUCT_FOR_ID(_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_)

Include/internal/pycore_runtime_init_generated.h
762:                INIT_ID(_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_), \
1879:    string = &_Py_ID(_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_);
5734:    if (Py_REFCNT((PyObject *)&_Py_ID(_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_)) < _PyObject_IMMORTAL_REFCNT) {
5735:        _PyObject_Dump((PyObject *)&_Py_ID(_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_));

Modules/_ctypes/stgdict.c
383:                &_Py_ID(_use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics_), &tmp) < 0)

Basically in only one place (and generate code).
No docs, no tests.
No issues: https://github.com/python/cpython/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+use_broken_old_ctypes_structure_semantics

And it feels like a python2 era thing.
I think it is time to remove it.

PR is on its way, so we can discuss the changes in more details.
CC @pitrou as the original author.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions