Skip to content

Conversation

gpshead
Copy link
Member

@gpshead gpshead commented Aug 15, 2025

Background: https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-intel-mac-to-tier-2/102100

I volunteered the people who spoke up in the thread as the owners. A few more of us also have final-model 8th-gen Intel mac hardware available but the list is already longer than we require. It'll stop getting security updates from Apple and thus be dangerous to even have online before we lose sufficient access for even tier 2.

Also clarify that my tier 3 Raspberry Pi OS bot is running the all-models compatible 32-bit version of the OS. That is the far more interesting config from a unique software support perspective.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4548.org.readthedocs.build/

I volunteered the people who spoke up in
https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-intel-mac-to-tier-2/102100 as the owners.
A few more of us also have final-model 8th-gen Intel mac hardware available but
the list is already longer than we require.  It'll stop getting security
updates from Apple and thus be dangerous to even have online before we lose
sufficient access for even tier 2.

Also clarify that my tier 3 Raspberry Pi is intentionally running the
all-models compatible 32-bit OS.
Copy link
Contributor

@willingc willingc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks reasonable. There may be some old mac minis around running lab automation, but Tier 2 is still a good level of support. Thanks @gpshead.

@zanieb
Copy link

zanieb commented Aug 15, 2025

@hugovk
Copy link
Member

hugovk commented Aug 15, 2025

The correct link, with an extra zero at the end:
https://discuss.python.org/t/dropping-intel-mac-to-tier-2/102100

@AA-Turner AA-Turner changed the title Demote macOS x86_64 to tier 2 PEP 11: Demote macOS x86_64 to tier 2 Aug 16, 2025
Copy link
Member

@encukou encukou left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.
@gpshead, since it's you, I assume the SC is either on board or doesn't see this as something that needs their approval.

@warsaw
Copy link
Member

warsaw commented Aug 18, 2025

LGTM. @gpshead, since it's you, I assume the SC is either on board or doesn't see this as something that needs their approval.

We haven't discussed it but I think it's fine and I'm happy to help with Intel macOS as long as that's viable.

CC: @pablogsal @emilyemorehouse @corona10 in case they want to weigh in.

@warsaw warsaw self-requested a review August 18, 2025 15:07
@corona10
Copy link
Member

CC: @pablogsal @emilyemorehouse @corona10 in case they want to weigh in.

I leave a nit comment.

@gpshead gpshead merged commit 5a2dc4a into python:main Aug 18, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants