- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 57
[Not ready for reviews yet, just want to run CI] - Implementing multi-fidelity bayesian search for the auto-tuner #1019
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. Action RequiredIn order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you. ProcessIn order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA. Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with  If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! | 
| kicked off the CI, but you'll probably need to update the requirements file | 
| @oulgen do you mind taking a look whenever time permits? | 
| Hey @FranciscoThiesen thank you for implementing a new autotuning algorithm. Could you share some results? Perhaps you can compare to PatternSearch in terms of 
 also please make sure the tests and the lint are passing | 
No description provided.