-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 250
Push torchtune install deeper in generate._gen_model_input and undo import order change for etmodel #1542
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Push torchtune install deeper in generate._gen_model_input and undo import order change for etmodel #1542
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1054,13 +1054,13 @@ def apply_rotary_emb(x: Tensor, freqs_cis: Tensor) -> Tensor: | |
# ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
|
||
try: | ||
# For llama::sdpa_with_kv_cache.out, preprocess ops | ||
from executorch.extension.llm.custom_ops import custom_ops # no-qa | ||
from executorch.extension.pybindings import portable_lib as exec_lib | ||
|
||
# ET changed the way it's loading the custom ops so it's not included in portable_lib but has to be loaded separately. | ||
# For quantized_decomposed ops | ||
from executorch.kernels import quantized # no-qa | ||
# For llama::sdpa_with_kv_cache.out, preprocess ops | ||
from executorch.extension.llm.custom_ops import custom_ops # no-qa | ||
Comment on lines
+1062
to
+1063
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nit: what's the difference this change made? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This was the original order prior to the other PR |
||
|
||
class PTEModel(nn.Module): | ||
def __init__(self, config, path) -> None: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we sure that everything below is for llama 3.2 11b? If so good to go, otherwise we need an if-else.
Will we in the future have more possibilities here in this func? If so, we list them with an if-else or switch-case chain.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yup everything below is 11B.
If there's more models that require casing this function as a whole should get refactored at that time