Update Demo using Aspect class #222
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@koriym has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThis pull request involves the removal of several files and the refactoring of existing demo scripts to utilize the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #222 +/- ##
===========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
+ Complexity 215 214 -1
===========================================
Files 27 27
Lines 558 558
===========================================
Hits 558 558 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
demo/04-my-matcher.php (1)
15-20: Consider improving temporary directory handling.While the binding logic is correct, the temporary directory handling could be improved:
- Consider making the temp directory configurable through environment variables or configuration.
- Implement cleanup mechanism for the temp directory to prevent accumulation of cached files.
Example improvement:
-$aspect = new Aspect(__DIR__ . '/tmp'); +$tmpDir = getenv('AOP_CACHE_DIR') ?: __DIR__ . '/tmp'; +$aspect = new Aspect($tmpDir);demo/02-matcher-bind.php (1)
17-21: Consider making the configuration more flexible and specific.A few suggestions to improve the implementation:
- Consider making the temporary directory path configurable through environment variables or configuration files
- The class matcher
any()is very broad. Consider using more specific matching criteria if possible to improve performanceExample improvement:
-$aspect = new Aspect(__DIR__ . '/tmp'); +$tmpDir = getenv('AOP_TMP_DIR') ?: __DIR__ . '/tmp'; +$aspect = new Aspect($tmpDir); $aspect->bind( - (new Matcher())->any(), // class match + (new Matcher())->subclassesOf(BillingService::class), // more specific class match (new Matcher())->startsWith('charge'), // method match [new WeekendBlocker()] // interceptors );
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
demo/01-explicit-bind.php(0 hunks)demo/02-matcher-bind.php(1 hunks)demo/03-annotation-bind.php(1 hunks)demo/04-my-matcher.php(1 hunks)demo/05-cache.php(0 hunks)demo/benchmark.php(0 hunks)demo/cache-write.php(0 hunks)demo/run.php(0 hunks)demo/src/EmptyInterceptor.php(0 hunks)demo/src/FooClass_Optimized.php(0 hunks)demo/src/ManualAdvice.php(0 hunks)demo/src/RealBillingService.php(1 hunks)demo/src/Timer.php(0 hunks)demo/src/interceptorA.php(0 hunks)demo/src/interceptorB.php(0 hunks)tests/Aspect/AspectTest.php(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (11)
- demo/01-explicit-bind.php
- demo/05-cache.php
- demo/benchmark.php
- demo/cache-write.php
- demo/run.php
- demo/src/EmptyInterceptor.php
- demo/src/FooClass_Optimized.php
- demo/src/ManualAdvice.php
- demo/src/Timer.php
- demo/src/interceptorA.php
- demo/src/interceptorB.php
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/Aspect/AspectTest.php
🔇 Additional comments (6)
demo/04-my-matcher.php (2)
7-7: LGTM! Import changes align with the new implementation.
The import changes correctly reflect the transition to using the Aspect class.
21-21: Verify RealBillingService implementation.
The service instantiation looks good, but let's verify the service implementation.
✅ Verification successful
RealBillingService implementation verified and correct
The service implementation is properly defined:
- Implements the
BillingServiceinterface correctly - Has the required
chargeOrder()method - Located at
demo/src/RealBillingService.php
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify RealBillingService exists and has the expected method
# Test 1: Check if the service class exists
ast-grep --pattern 'class RealBillingService {
$$$
}'
# Test 2: Verify the chargeOrder method implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function chargeOrder() {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find the service implementation
# Search for RealBillingService in PHP files
rg -t php "class RealBillingService" -A 5
# Search for any file containing RealBillingService
fd RealBillingService
# Look for any interface or class that might be related to billing
rg -t php "interface.*Billing|class.*Billing" -A 5
Length of output: 1509
demo/03-annotation-bind.php (3)
7-7: LGTM: Import statements are correctly updated.
The addition of the Aspect import aligns with the PR's objective of transitioning to the Aspect class for AOP binding.
21-21: LGTM: Service instantiation is simplified and well-handled.
The new instantiation approach using Aspect::newInstance() is more straightforward while maintaining proper error handling through the try-catch block.
15-20: Consider adding temp directory cleanup and error handling.
While the Aspect configuration is more concise, there are a few considerations:
- The temp directory might accumulate generated files over time
- There's no error handling for directory creation/access issues
Consider adding:
- Cleanup mechanism for the temp directory
- Directory access validation:
+$tmpDir = __DIR__ . '/tmp';
+if (!is_dir($tmpDir) && !mkdir($tmpDir, 0777, true)) {
+ throw new RuntimeException("Failed to create temp directory: {$tmpDir}");
+}
-$aspect = new Aspect(__DIR__ . '/tmp');
+$aspect = new Aspect($tmpDir);demo/02-matcher-bind.php (1)
17-21: LGTM! Clean implementation of aspect-oriented programming.
The new implementation using the Aspect class provides a more streamlined approach to method interception. The matcher configuration is clear and follows AOP best practices.
| public function chargeOrder() | ||
| { | ||
| echo 'Charged.' . PHP_EOL; | ||
| return 'Charged.' . PHP_EOL; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Interface compatibility needs attention
The interface BillingService doesn't specify a return type for chargeOrder(), while the implementation now returns a string. There's also another implementation AnnotationRealBillingService that needs to be checked for consistency.
demo/src/BillingService.php: Add return type declaration to interfacedemo/src/AnnotationRealBillingService.php: Update implementation to match the new return behavior
🔗 Analysis chain
Good improvement in method design!
The change from echoing output to returning a string is a positive improvement that:
- Makes the method more testable
- Provides better separation of concerns
- Gives callers more control over output handling
Let's verify the interface compatibility:
Let me try a different search strategy to find the interface and implementations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if BillingService interface has been updated to match
# the new return type and if there are other implementations that need updating
# Search for interface definition
echo "Checking BillingService interface definition:"
ast-grep --pattern 'interface BillingService {
$$$
chargeOrder($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for other implementations
echo "Checking for other BillingService implementations:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements BillingService {
$$$
chargeOrder($$$) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 415
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for interface and implementation files
echo "=== Finding relevant PHP files ==="
fd -e php
echo -e "\n=== Checking interface definition ==="
rg -l "interface BillingService"
echo -e "\n=== Checking implementations ==="
rg -l "implements BillingService"
echo -e "\n=== Content of interface file if found ==="
rg "interface BillingService" -A 5 -B 1
echo -e "\n=== Content of implementation files ==="
rg "implements BillingService" -A 5 -B 1
Length of output: 6752
demo/02-matcher-bind.php
Outdated
| use Ray\Aop\Aspect; | ||
| use Ray\Aop\Bind; | ||
| use Ray\Aop\Compiler; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove unused imports.
The Bind and Compiler classes are no longer used in this file after the refactoring to use the Aspect class.
use Ray\Aop\Aspect;
-use Ray\Aop\Bind;
-use Ray\Aop\Compiler;
use Ray\Aop\Matcher;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| use Ray\Aop\Aspect; | |
| use Ray\Aop\Bind; | |
| use Ray\Aop\Compiler; | |
| use Ray\Aop\Aspect; | |
| use Ray\Aop\Matcher; |
Replaced the Bind, Compiler, and Pointcut classes with the Aspect class in the demo scripts. This simplifies the creation of AOP instances and binds the matchers directly within the Aspect class for better maintainability.
Deleted multiple unused interceptor classes, utility scripts, and demo files. This cleanup helps in reducing clutter within the repository and ensures that only relevant files are maintained.
This modification ensures that the chargeOrder method returns the string 'Charged.' instead of directly outputting it. This allows for better handling of the method's result, especially in testing or when integrating with other parts of the system.
Removed the unused Bind and Compiler imports from the file, simplifying the import list and reducing potential confusion. This cleanup helps maintain clean and readable code.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
chargeOrdermethod inRealBillingServiceto return a string, enhancing usability.Documentation
AspectTestclass for clarity.Chores