Skip to content

[RDKE] L2 Tests And Integration With CI for Remote Debugger Dynamic Updates #98

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 50 commits into from
Apr 7, 2025

Conversation

Abhinavpv28
Copy link
Contributor

@Abhinavpv28 Abhinavpv28 commented Mar 14, 2025

Reason for change: L2 tests integration for remote debugger for dynamic profile
Test Procedure: Run L2 test woekflow
Risks: Low
Signed-off-by: Abhinav P V [email protected]

@Abhinavpv28 Abhinavpv28 requested review from a team as code owners March 14, 2025 10:48
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Mar 14, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@nhanasi
Copy link
Contributor

nhanasi commented Apr 1, 2025

@Abhinavpv28 - please make sure we have the feature file and test file created for all the testcases and the same name is used.

@Abhinavpv28 Abhinavpv28 changed the title L2 test [RDKE] L2 Tests And Integration With CI for Remote Debugger Dynamic Updates Apr 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@nhanasi nhanasi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test/functional-tests/features/rrd_append_dynamic_profile_static_not_found.feature is not correct

Copy link
Contributor

@nhanasi nhanasi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test/functional-tests/tests/test_rrd_dynamic_profile_missing_report.py
In this first the request need to be check in static profile and if not found only it has to go for dynamic and then if media/apps present it should use else go for download

@nhanasi nhanasi merged commit 0a9ef31 into develop Apr 7, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants