Skip to content

odf_setup: make the task names compatible with dcijunit #651

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fredericlepied
Copy link
Contributor

@fredericlepied fredericlepied commented Apr 21, 2025

SUMMARY

Make sure the tests from odf_setup appear as Junit in DCI.

ISSUE TYPE
  • Enhanced Feature
Tests

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Updated task names in test workflows for improved clarity and consistency.

@fredericlepied fredericlepied requested a review from a team as a code owner April 21, 2025 10:06
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Apr 21, 2025

from change #651:

  • no check (not a code change)

1 similar comment
@dcibot
Copy link
Collaborator

dcibot commented Apr 21, 2025

from change #651:

  • no check (not a code change)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The update modifies task names within the roles/odf_setup/tasks/tests.yml Ansible playbook. Task names referring to CephRBD and CephFS PVC tests and status checks are adjusted by adding underscores and rewording for clarity. No changes are made to the underlying logic, parameters, or execution flow of the tasks; the modifications are limited to the display names of the tasks.

Changes

File Change Summary
roles/odf_setup/tasks/tests.yml Renamed task names: "Test CephRBD PVC" → "Test_ CephRBD PVC", "Get CephRBD PVC status" → "Validate_ CephRBD PVC status", "Test CephFS PVC" → "Test_ CephFS PVC", "Get CephFS PVC status" → "Validate_ CephFS PVC status".

Poem

In YAML fields where tasks reside,
Names now march with underscores wide.
CephRBD and CephFS, so neat,
With "Test_" and "Validate_" they greet.
No logic changed, just names anew—
A tidy warren, through and through!
🐇✨

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e15b136 and 4b1b497.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • roles/odf_setup/tasks/tests.yml (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.9)
  • GitHub Check: Sanity Check (stable-2.17)

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
- cephrbd_pvc_status.resources != []
- cephrbd_pvc_status.resources[0].status.phase == "Bound"

- name: Test CephFS PVC
- name: Test_ CephFS PVC
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Standardize test task name for CephFS PVC
Similar to the RBD task, "Test_ CephFS PVC" should not have a space after the underscore. Use a fully underscore‐separated name to ensure consistent JUnit output:

Proposed diff:

- name: Test_ CephFS PVC
+ name: Test_CephFS_PVC

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
---
- name: Test CephRBD PVC
- name: Test_ CephRBD PVC
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix task name formatting to remove space after underscore
The current task name uses "Test_ CephRBD PVC", which contains an undesired space after the underscore and may produce inconsistent JUnit test identifiers. Use underscores consistently for all word separators.

Proposed diff:

- name: Test_ CephRBD PVC
+ name: Test_CephRBD_PVC
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Test_ CephRBD PVC
- name: Test_CephRBD_PVC

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
storage: 1Gi
storageClassName: "{{ ocs_sc_rbd_name }}"

- name: Get CephRBD PVC status
- name: Validate_ CephRBD PVC status
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Normalize validation task name to underscore-separated format
The task name "Validate_ CephRBD PVC status" mixes an underscore with a space and still contains spaces elsewhere. For uniform JUnit-compatible naming, convert all spaces to underscores:

Proposed diff:

- name: Validate_ CephRBD PVC status
+ name: Validate_CephRBD_PVC_status
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Validate_ CephRBD PVC status
- name: Validate_CephRBD_PVC_status

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
storage: 1Gi
storageClassName: "{{ ocs_sc_cephfs_name }}"

- name: Get CephFS PVC status
- name: Validate_ CephFS PVC status
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Ensure consistency in CephFS PVC validation task name
Rename "Validate_ CephFS PVC status" to an all-underscore format so the JUnit parser will treat it as a single identifier:

Proposed diff:

- name: Validate_ CephFS PVC status
+ name: Validate_CephFS_PVC_status
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Validate_ CephFS PVC status
- name: Validate_CephFS_PVC_status

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants